Khazarians are the spiritual descendants of Pharisee the original progeny of vipers which is am analogy for demons thus making them one under the synagogue of satan. God would never curse His own Son to be born among such vile clique.
Khazarians are the spiritual descendants of Pharisee
It's easy to say Khazaria is the Synagogue of Satan, but I'm not sure about the Pharisee connection. From a religious perspective I would say they're aligned more with the Sabbatean-Frankists.
TLDR: Jews today aren't really descended from historic Jews, and "judeo-Cheistianity" is being used to make current Jews think they're related to Jesus.
Which really misses the point that ALL have sinned, and that Jesus is the ONLY way to Heaven. Current Jews (genetically or not) are in rebellion against God by not believing on Jesus.
Evangelical Christianity seems to push the idea that the Jews are still Gods people, even though they are in rebellion against Him. The only thing Christians owe the Jews is the Gospel, which we owe to ALL non-believers.
The only thing Christians owe the Jews is the Gospel
Not even that. The Gospel is the first section of the Christian New Testament scripture, comprising the books of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, concerned with the birth, ministry, passion, and resurrection of Jesus who they hate with a passion.
Being a Jew is more of a spiritual designation in the new testament. When it comes to people saying "they are Jews but are not", that's spiritual.
Case in point what Jesus said to the Pharisees,
"I know that ye are Abraham's seed; but ye seek to kill me, because my word hath no place in you. I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and ye do that which ye have seen with your father.
They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham. But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham."
You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you want to do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth,
Yet still to this day there are fake Christians who make faith about the flesh.
And that line about being a murderer from the beginning also makes me think of the Roman Catholic inquisitions and killing of bible believers.
Not all have big noses and curly hair, but I agree with you they are easy to be identified by physical characteristics. Most are easy to tell, but some are harder. For instance on the male side I struggled with accepting Michael Landon was a jew. And he was. He was born Eugene Maurice Orowitz, and we know for sure his father was jew. There's debate about his mother full jewish status. However, he himself claimed to be jewish.
The link has nothing actionable. Freedman's theory is that two peoples can be distinguished and kept separate throughout history, but this doesn't agree with the facts. There was a Judahite people in diaspora and a Khazarian people in Khazaria, and they agreed to merge in that Khazarians were given citizenship and intermarriage rights with Judahites. In the 10th century the word "Ju" and homonyms was first noticed in French as a short form of Latin "Judaeus"; they were used synonymously. At the end of the 10th century the Khazars were conquered and didn't retain their identity as a people, even though those who had escaped continued to be accepted as Judahites.
Peoples have the rights to accept mergers and to decide for themselves what name they use. For Freedman's theory to work there would have to be no intermarriage and no unity of polity, but it's long recognized that Ashkenazi (largely descended from Khazarians) and Sephardi (largely descended from earlier Judahites) have different genes but equal citizenship, marriage rights, and unity of polity.
Separately, Bible passages were brought forward as if they applied to all Jews. Textually they don't at all, but it's also neglected that according to Acts 3-4, the crowd that called for Jesus's death also constituted hundreds of the first 5,000 catholic Christians. So that did a lot of work on reversing the curse. In the end it will be totally reversed, Romans 11.
For us to say the Jews are not Jews is tantamount to giving them permission to say the Americans are not Americans.
If some but not all have Khazar heritage, by what right do we say the Jews don't get to decide who are Jews if we want to prevent them from saying Americans don't get to decide who are Americans?
I'll grant you that I'm not finding the evidence on which OED makes its determinations. Possibly a slightly interesting twist, but, (logic) since the theory is that the Khazars joined other Jews, the people doesn't cease to be Jews.
The Jewish people have a continuous polity from the time of Judah. If we have the right to tell Jews they're not Jews, they have the right to tell Americans they're not Americans.
Long lies, short lies, it's just lies form you. That's why it doesn't matter. That's why I don't even bother reading more than a couple sentences of your word vomit. BTW, jews are the synagogue of satan.
This is a good resource too:
https://christogenea.org/podcasts/society/exactly-why-jesus-christ-not-jew
Khazarians are the spiritual descendants of Pharisee the original progeny of vipers which is am analogy for demons thus making them one under the synagogue of satan. God would never curse His own Son to be born among such vile clique.
It's easy to say Khazaria is the Synagogue of Satan, but I'm not sure about the Pharisee connection. From a religious perspective I would say they're aligned more with the Sabbatean-Frankists.
TLDR: Jews today aren't really descended from historic Jews, and "judeo-Cheistianity" is being used to make current Jews think they're related to Jesus.
Which really misses the point that ALL have sinned, and that Jesus is the ONLY way to Heaven. Current Jews (genetically or not) are in rebellion against God by not believing on Jesus.
Evangelical Christianity seems to push the idea that the Jews are still Gods people, even though they are in rebellion against Him. The only thing Christians owe the Jews is the Gospel, which we owe to ALL non-believers.
Not even that. The Gospel is the first section of the Christian New Testament scripture, comprising the books of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, concerned with the birth, ministry, passion, and resurrection of Jesus who they hate with a passion.
Being a Jew is more of a spiritual designation in the new testament. When it comes to people saying "they are Jews but are not", that's spiritual.
Case in point what Jesus said to the Pharisees,
Yet still to this day there are fake Christians who make faith about the flesh.
And that line about being a murderer from the beginning also makes me think of the Roman Catholic inquisitions and killing of bible believers.
Then where do they get the big noses and curly hair, by going to a synagogue?
Not all have big noses and curly hair, but I agree with you they are easy to be identified by physical characteristics. Most are easy to tell, but some are harder. For instance on the male side I struggled with accepting Michael Landon was a jew. And he was. He was born Eugene Maurice Orowitz, and we know for sure his father was jew. There's debate about his mother full jewish status. However, he himself claimed to be jewish.
Clearly you didn't read the article which is a book excerpt by the way. Now go there, read it then come back here to have an unbiased discussion.
The link has nothing actionable. Freedman's theory is that two peoples can be distinguished and kept separate throughout history, but this doesn't agree with the facts. There was a Judahite people in diaspora and a Khazarian people in Khazaria, and they agreed to merge in that Khazarians were given citizenship and intermarriage rights with Judahites. In the 10th century the word "Ju" and homonyms was first noticed in French as a short form of Latin "Judaeus"; they were used synonymously. At the end of the 10th century the Khazars were conquered and didn't retain their identity as a people, even though those who had escaped continued to be accepted as Judahites.
Peoples have the rights to accept mergers and to decide for themselves what name they use. For Freedman's theory to work there would have to be no intermarriage and no unity of polity, but it's long recognized that Ashkenazi (largely descended from Khazarians) and Sephardi (largely descended from earlier Judahites) have different genes but equal citizenship, marriage rights, and unity of polity.
Separately, Bible passages were brought forward as if they applied to all Jews. Textually they don't at all, but it's also neglected that according to Acts 3-4, the crowd that called for Jesus's death also constituted hundreds of the first 5,000 catholic Christians. So that did a lot of work on reversing the curse. In the end it will be totally reversed, Romans 11.
For us to say the Jews are not Jews is tantamount to giving them permission to say the Americans are not Americans.
I was expecting you to show up with your baseless walls of text discrediting the historian and author of the article.
Apart from your cucked coffee table book you blasphemously call Bible do you any any other historical sources to backup your claims?
Ask your AI to limit the answer to 100/words or less.
Freedman wasn't a historian.
Variants of "Jew" begin in the 10th century, elision from Latin "Judaeus".
The Khazar hypothesis states Khazars joined Judahites already in Eastern Europe, not that they had no genetic connection to Judahites.
If some but not all have Khazar heritage, by what right do we say the Jews don't get to decide who are Jews if we want to prevent them from saying Americans don't get to decide who are Americans?
Including Wikipedia.
I'm not even bothering theckibg your other two links after your first is an unofficial edit of Wikipedia of all places.
You're using an old argument to attack Friedman. One that is present in the article and has been used for decades.
Anyway, how to tell you're a khazarian without saying it?
You're a joke satanist.
See, it doesn't matter if I go short or long.
I'll grant you that I'm not finding the evidence on which OED makes its determinations. Possibly a slightly interesting twist, but, (logic) since the theory is that the Khazars joined other Jews, the people doesn't cease to be Jews.
The Jewish people have a continuous polity from the time of Judah. If we have the right to tell Jews they're not Jews, they have the right to tell Americans they're not Americans.
Long lies, short lies, it's just lies form you. That's why it doesn't matter. That's why I don't even bother reading more than a couple sentences of your word vomit. BTW, jews are the synagogue of satan.