Hi, since you're alluding to me: (1) You're obviously ban-evading and u/Thisisnotanexit said that's two weeks, but I'd propose you might be able not to get banned if you contacted her privately instead; if you think the discussion should be public, then privately ask her for early release for that purpose. (2) You should probably report u/DresdenFirebomber privately since you don't list any public rationale for specific mod actions. (3) She's already agreed on rejecting the word nazi. (4) I appealed a number of post removals that were reversed, appeals work, they work with bans too if the person recognizes and amends the behavior banned. (5) I'm sure she would want to work on not being condescending, patronizing, etc. and will take it to heart. (6) Neo1 brought up the need for organization and between him and me there were discussions about getting a new mod and many names proposed; it was after that that admin informed TINAE she was the likeliest candidate based on the community response. (7) I'm all for criticism of Christianity on a level playing field, accusations that Christians are taking over Conspiracies are a proper topic if not made into excessive meta posts (right now meta posts would need review); I even join in on posts that certain Christians really messed up if it's constructive. (8) I affirm a community vote on the meaning of Rule 1, and have said so for months, but I probably shouldn't be the one to post it (a neutral post on the topic from a ban evader might not get deleted, but I can't say).