Probably removed because that is an easily checked lie that you keep repeating. The German age of consent in modern Germany is the same as it was in the WW1 German Empire and in all the various German governments in between.
Do you not know when WW1 was? The laws you're whining about pre-date NSDAP by decades and have been unchanged for over a century. I've pointed this fact out to you before.
Edit offer was made. Was it accepted? Otherwise the offending sentence is collectivist and disrespectful. Would OP or mod like to flag the post as free-for-all? That would presumably also allow comments to be restored after a modmail request.
Offending word in uneditable title. Disrespectful of other views. Seems like you could flag as free-for-all and request restoration by modmail, if such a request is not abused.
Without the flair, these seem straightforward violations based on my reading or the mod team's reading. The fact that there are other readings is why we now have the flair.
I managed to recover this before deletion, so I'll quote it with one word omitted:
I definitely did not delete my comment. I would not censor my authentic and accurate view of what Nazis are. As the real Joseph Malta, the "Hangman 10", so named for his performance of 10 executions of high ranking Nazis, said : "[The execution of Nazis] had to be done. It was a pleasure doing it. I would do it again. They weren't sorry for anything."
That's part of the message I had passed on, but this tag made me come here myself. Why are you lying about removing my comment when you clearly have done? Why are you not allowing people to call a spade a spade by banning calling the Nazi ... Nazis?
You write reasonably except for falling into a dehumanizing word at the end. I was going to say there may be a miscommunication because u/Thisisnotanexit is reading the tools as saying mod-deleted comments were also user-deleted after the fact and this is a consistent appearance. Since you confirm the one I linked above was not user-deleted, it appears she should double-check. If she can see the comment at this link, it was not user-deleted; if she can't see it, she should probably contact Meta or admin mail to find out why:
At the same time I am hopeful your understanding about the tool specs during the transition period won't be hampered by working out details of individual case law. However, now that you've been banned, it would need to be by a route like modmail. (1) My understanding, which might differ from hers, is that the comment in this thread was deleted for dehumanization, a category of disrespect. In your place I would offer that you be either permitted to flair the thread as free-for-all or to delete the second-to-last word (or more), and request restoration. (2) As to the original comment, I understand that it's collectivism because of broad generalization, which is also disrespect (and I call it judging the innocent with the guilty). I would offer an edit like adding the word "many" to the beginning of the comment, to qualify it properly, and requesting restoration.
I was going to reply to your other deleted comment; I see nothing wrong in the log and don't recall anything wrong with what I read of it, so if you want it restored as an exception to the crackdown I'd suggest looking for a similar edit negotiation.
It'd also be appropriate that, when you complain in forums known for banning people on one side of the discussion, you'd be prepared to note it in case part of the problem appears to be ramping up the mod tool specs and not an intentional lie or miscommunication.
Probably removed because that is an easily checked lie that you keep repeating. The German age of consent in modern Germany is the same as it was in the WW1 German Empire and in all the various German governments in between.
Do you not know when WW1 was? The laws you're whining about pre-date NSDAP by decades and have been unchanged for over a century. I've pointed this fact out to you before.
Your Manson post was removed due to your choice of words.
I said I'd look into these two.
Edit offer was made. Was it accepted? Otherwise the offending sentence is collectivist and disrespectful. Would OP or mod like to flag the post as free-for-all? That would presumably also allow comments to be restored after a modmail request.
Offending word in uneditable title. Disrespectful of other views. Seems like you could flag as free-for-all and request restoration by modmail, if such a request is not abused.
Without the flair, these seem straightforward violations based on my reading or the mod team's reading. The fact that there are other readings is why we now have the flair.
u/JosephMalta u/Thisisnotanexit
These were deleted by the user, perhaps another, new leafer turning? They were rightly removed and no retro free for all thread to be enacted.
Edit: I was incorrect in this comment, see update: https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARws4ap4K/files-mentioning-elon-musk-and-i/c/4eZDpRkbXCq
I managed to recover this before deletion, so I'll quote it with one word omitted:
You write reasonably except for falling into a dehumanizing word at the end. I was going to say there may be a miscommunication because u/Thisisnotanexit is reading the tools as saying mod-deleted comments were also user-deleted after the fact and this is a consistent appearance. Since you confirm the one I linked above was not user-deleted, it appears she should double-check. If she can see the comment at this link, it was not user-deleted; if she can't see it, she should probably contact Meta or admin mail to find out why:
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARws4ap4K/files-mentioning-elon-musk-and-i/c/4eZDW0uo9Am
At the same time I am hopeful your understanding about the tool specs during the transition period won't be hampered by working out details of individual case law. However, now that you've been banned, it would need to be by a route like modmail. (1) My understanding, which might differ from hers, is that the comment in this thread was deleted for dehumanization, a category of disrespect. In your place I would offer that you be either permitted to flair the thread as free-for-all or to delete the second-to-last word (or more), and request restoration. (2) As to the original comment, I understand that it's collectivism because of broad generalization, which is also disrespect (and I call it judging the innocent with the guilty). I would offer an edit like adding the word "many" to the beginning of the comment, to qualify it properly, and requesting restoration.
I was going to reply to your other deleted comment; I see nothing wrong in the log and don't recall anything wrong with what I read of it, so if you want it restored as an exception to the crackdown I'd suggest looking for a similar edit negotiation.
It'd also be appropriate that, when you complain in forums known for banning people on one side of the discussion, you'd be prepared to note it in case part of the problem appears to be ramping up the mod tool specs and not an intentional lie or miscommunication.
You bring nothing to discussion and are being banned for constant disruption.
The site is being "sanitized" of opinions that don't fit the Nazi bot farm.