I'll say what i wish someone had said the last time this came up, it's an easy win, don't fuck it up:

thank them for proving your point, don't try to argue with the mental gymnastics masquerading as math.

In the end, the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense. And what was terrifying was not that they would kill you for thinking otherwise, but that they might be right. For, after all, how do we know that two and two make four? Or that the force of gravity works? Or that the past is unchangeable? If both the past and the external world exist only in the mind, and if the mind itself is controllable — what then?

Oh the irony. Orwell cheered the bombing of Dresden. He would have agreed with me completely about you and your kind.

https://theconversation.com/how-george-orwell-justified-killing-german-civilians-in-the-second-world-war-139151

His pretext was the publication by Vera Brittain, the feminist and pre-war pacifist, of Seed of Chaos, her pungent denunciation of obliteration bombing.

Every time.

Orwell was indeed right. Killing Nazi civilians was moral and just, as he stated in his opinion column during the war.

Bringing the war home to those who voted for it would bring an end to it faster, and shielding demographics from the consequences of war just makes them support it more.