Further digging shows Schneersohn was unable to speak after a stroke on 1992-03-02. Bit of a smoking gun for Popoff. Again, I'm not defending Schneersohn, I'm simply indicating evidence that he didn't say what you said he said, and noting that this trend of attributing world-order writings to cabals without evidence happens regularly in one direction.
Palestinian Muslims, Christians, and Jews have rights to self-determination like any peoples. It is not their fault that they are ruled by Hamas, who is perennially bad at negotiating. Israel is being tried for genocide by the ICJ and I've said repeatedly that we'll see how it goes; there have only been about 2 convictions for genocide in history (Rwanda and Serbia). Nahida and Samar Anton were Palestinian nonbelligerents shot on 2023-12-16 who are now regarded as Christian martyrs. Estimates of dead Palestinian Arabs start with Gaza Health (70,000; 34,000 confirmed names) and Israeli IDF (20,000 combatants); obviously 2,000 Israelis ("Palestinian Jews") are also dead, over half on 2023-10-07. The Lancet actual report agreed with the 70,000 range, but correspondence therein made up the estimate of 186,000 to include "affected deaths", the same justification used for inventing larger numbers. If you're unfamiliar with disaster reporting, think of covid reporting: it's become fashionable to attribute any death during a disaster to the disaster if it can be tied to the disaster by some published rationale. Therefore these numbers basically include everyone who died over the 2+ years because the war prevented them from medical services. I investigated the UN methodology myself and they literally include obesity comorbidity deaths because of the theory that medical access was denied by the war. So I believe in waiting for those who can review the evidence to make a decision. How else could the Palestinians be defended other than by having their day in court?
The only use of "chosen people" in the KJV oddly refers to a Gentile army, so I don't use the term. And if you find this "beyond horrifying" then you have hardly reviewed the book of Revelation or the wars and tyrannies of the 20th century.
That's exactly what you are doing, you are defending a racist Zionist who thinks non-jews are different species: “This is what needs to be said about the body: the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of [members] of all nations of the world … The difference in the inner quality between Jews and non-Jews is “so great that the bodies should be considered as completely different species.” - Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson
This speech was uttered by Schneerson in 1994. Later a letter sent to the newspaper was published in the Vologda newspaper “Slavyanin», N-4 (32), 2001 in Russia. There is debate about its authenticity, as once argued about the validity of “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” but it is an indisputable fact that almost all the goals, laid out by Schneerson, have been achieved by now. This speech is simply the application of Talmud to Ukraine and Russia. Talmud says: Jews should murder and enslave goyim worldwide. This speech says: Jews should murder and enslave goyim in Ukraine and Russia.
When I said your quote about souls was accurate and need not be challenged: he stands or falls on what he did say.
He did not give any speeches in 1994 because he had had a stroke and became incommunicative in 1992. Please read what I write.
The fact that Popoff published a good guess as to goals to be accomplished doesn't mean Schneersohn agreed with those goals; he stands or falls on what he did say.
The Talmud does not say "Jews should murder and enslave goyim worldwide" and cannot be sourced to that effect. It does describe a secondary status for those who do not agree with beliefs of Judaism, and it's very interesting in comparative religion to see similarity with other faiths' treatment of outsiders, but you said you're not interested in details like that. If you want to get into specifics we'll need to agree on how to determine who wrote a text and what it actually says instead of making wild inferences that also happen to support prior bias.
Yes, Deut. 7:6, 14:2 KJV says Israel is a "holy people" and "special/peculiar people", and as a Christian I believe the Bible. Most recognize how this applies to spiritual Israel, the church. The spiritual promises don't apply to national Israel, and the national promises don't apply to spiritual Israel. National promises of Israel are like those given in the Bible to many other nations, for instance that Egypt would always remain a people. I point out that the promises to national Israel include both the best and the worst of the other national promises, related to their behavior. It's not Zionist to say that Egypt, Israel, Syria, Jordan and others have national promises in the Bible and these always come true. None of this gives any special right to Israel as Zionists propose; I simply agree each people has its own right to self-determination, including the Palestinians. So far the Palestinians used that right to elect Hamas, so we'll see if they come up with a better idea.
I came to Scored to share deep research on areas where I have some experience, and I speak here about government, taxation, textual analysis (Q), religion, conspiracy, whatever comes up. I correct errors across the board when I'm aware and have something constructive to say. Funny thing, as I pointed out in the hoax article, more errors, and more easily debunked ones, appear against the Jews than toward any other subject; so I find myself putting more work there in spite of my broader interests. On the same linked page, I just started listing my corrections of Quran misquotes, and they seem to come up a whole lot less often than Talmud misquotes for some reason. I'm equal opportunity.
Now why do you suppose people would go on claiming a man gave a hateful speech after he had a stroke when they've been presented with evidence he couldn't have? My best explanation is that people who do that are likely to be shilling for Jews by making anti-Semitism look stupid. If you're not shilling for the JIDF, you would agree that the Popoff quote looks like an inappropriate source for a good researcher to use in determining his actual position, and not just retreat to other quotes and misunderstandings. The record shows I'm happy to criticize the Jews and the state of Israel, but there's so much more false criticism out there that there's little opportunity for constructive criticism.
Further digging shows Schneersohn was unable to speak after a stroke on 1992-03-02. Bit of a smoking gun for Popoff. Again, I'm not defending Schneersohn, I'm simply indicating evidence that he didn't say what you said he said, and noting that this trend of attributing world-order writings to cabals without evidence happens regularly in one direction.
Palestinian Muslims, Christians, and Jews have rights to self-determination like any peoples. It is not their fault that they are ruled by Hamas, who is perennially bad at negotiating. Israel is being tried for genocide by the ICJ and I've said repeatedly that we'll see how it goes; there have only been about 2 convictions for genocide in history (Rwanda and Serbia). Nahida and Samar Anton were Palestinian nonbelligerents shot on 2023-12-16 who are now regarded as Christian martyrs. Estimates of dead Palestinian Arabs start with Gaza Health (70,000; 34,000 confirmed names) and Israeli IDF (20,000 combatants); obviously 2,000 Israelis ("Palestinian Jews") are also dead, over half on 2023-10-07. The Lancet actual report agreed with the 70,000 range, but correspondence therein made up the estimate of 186,000 to include "affected deaths", the same justification used for inventing larger numbers. If you're unfamiliar with disaster reporting, think of covid reporting: it's become fashionable to attribute any death during a disaster to the disaster if it can be tied to the disaster by some published rationale. Therefore these numbers basically include everyone who died over the 2+ years because the war prevented them from medical services. I investigated the UN methodology myself and they literally include obesity comorbidity deaths because of the theory that medical access was denied by the war. So I believe in waiting for those who can review the evidence to make a decision. How else could the Palestinians be defended other than by having their day in court?
The only use of "chosen people" in the KJV oddly refers to a Gentile army, so I don't use the term. And if you find this "beyond horrifying" then you have hardly reviewed the book of Revelation or the wars and tyrannies of the 20th century.
That's exactly what you are doing, you are defending a racist Zionist who thinks non-jews are different species: “This is what needs to be said about the body: the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of [members] of all nations of the world … The difference in the inner quality between Jews and non-Jews is “so great that the bodies should be considered as completely different species.” - Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson
This speech was uttered by Schneerson in 1994. Later a letter sent to the newspaper was published in the Vologda newspaper “Slavyanin», N-4 (32), 2001 in Russia. There is debate about its authenticity, as once argued about the validity of “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” but it is an indisputable fact that almost all the goals, laid out by Schneerson, have been achieved by now. This speech is simply the application of Talmud to Ukraine and Russia. Talmud says: Jews should murder and enslave goyim worldwide. This speech says: Jews should murder and enslave goyim in Ukraine and Russia.
KJV? the "chosen people" is what they think of themselves: "In Deuteronomy, YHWH chooses Israel to be his holy (kadosh) and treasured (segulah) people." - TheTorah.com
And who you believe they are. Why else would you always come to their defense. Every single time.
When I said your quote about souls was accurate and need not be challenged: he stands or falls on what he did say.
He did not give any speeches in 1994 because he had had a stroke and became incommunicative in 1992. Please read what I write.
The fact that Popoff published a good guess as to goals to be accomplished doesn't mean Schneersohn agreed with those goals; he stands or falls on what he did say.
The Talmud does not say "Jews should murder and enslave goyim worldwide" and cannot be sourced to that effect. It does describe a secondary status for those who do not agree with beliefs of Judaism, and it's very interesting in comparative religion to see similarity with other faiths' treatment of outsiders, but you said you're not interested in details like that. If you want to get into specifics we'll need to agree on how to determine who wrote a text and what it actually says instead of making wild inferences that also happen to support prior bias.
Yes, Deut. 7:6, 14:2 KJV says Israel is a "holy people" and "special/peculiar people", and as a Christian I believe the Bible. Most recognize how this applies to spiritual Israel, the church. The spiritual promises don't apply to national Israel, and the national promises don't apply to spiritual Israel. National promises of Israel are like those given in the Bible to many other nations, for instance that Egypt would always remain a people. I point out that the promises to national Israel include both the best and the worst of the other national promises, related to their behavior. It's not Zionist to say that Egypt, Israel, Syria, Jordan and others have national promises in the Bible and these always come true. None of this gives any special right to Israel as Zionists propose; I simply agree each people has its own right to self-determination, including the Palestinians. So far the Palestinians used that right to elect Hamas, so we'll see if they come up with a better idea.
I came to Scored to share deep research on areas where I have some experience, and I speak here about government, taxation, textual analysis (Q), religion, conspiracy, whatever comes up. I correct errors across the board when I'm aware and have something constructive to say. Funny thing, as I pointed out in the hoax article, more errors, and more easily debunked ones, appear against the Jews than toward any other subject; so I find myself putting more work there in spite of my broader interests. On the same linked page, I just started listing my corrections of Quran misquotes, and they seem to come up a whole lot less often than Talmud misquotes for some reason. I'm equal opportunity.
Now why do you suppose people would go on claiming a man gave a hateful speech after he had a stroke when they've been presented with evidence he couldn't have? My best explanation is that people who do that are likely to be shilling for Jews by making anti-Semitism look stupid. If you're not shilling for the JIDF, you would agree that the Popoff quote looks like an inappropriate source for a good researcher to use in determining his actual position, and not just retreat to other quotes and misunderstandings. The record shows I'm happy to criticize the Jews and the state of Israel, but there's so much more false criticism out there that there's little opportunity for constructive criticism.