When I said your quote about souls was accurate and need not be challenged: he stands or falls on what he did say.
He did not give any speeches in 1994 because he had had a stroke and became incommunicative in 1992. Please read what I write.
The fact that Popoff published a good guess as to goals to be accomplished doesn't mean Schneersohn agreed with those goals; he stands or falls on what he did say.
The Talmud does not say "Jews should murder and enslave goyim worldwide" and cannot be sourced to that effect. It does describe a secondary status for those who do not agree with beliefs of Judaism, and it's very interesting in comparative religion to see similarity with other faiths' treatment of outsiders, but you said you're not interested in details like that. If you want to get into specifics we'll need to agree on how to determine who wrote a text and what it actually says instead of making wild inferences that also happen to support prior bias.
Yes, Deut. 7:6, 14:2 KJV says Israel is a "holy people" and "special/peculiar people", and as a Christian I believe the Bible. Most recognize how this applies to spiritual Israel, the church. The spiritual promises don't apply to national Israel, and the national promises don't apply to spiritual Israel. National promises of Israel are like those given in the Bible to many other nations, for instance that Egypt would always remain a people. I point out that the promises to national Israel include both the best and the worst of the other national promises, related to their behavior. It's not Zionist to say that Egypt, Israel, Syria, Jordan and others have national promises in the Bible and these always come true. None of this gives any special right to Israel as Zionists propose; I simply agree each people has its own right to self-determination, including the Palestinians. So far the Palestinians used that right to elect Hamas, so we'll see if they come up with a better idea.
I came to Scored to share deep research on areas where I have some experience, and I speak here about government, taxation, textual analysis (Q), religion, conspiracy, whatever comes up. I correct errors across the board when I'm aware and have something constructive to say. Funny thing, as I pointed out in the hoax article, more errors, and more easily debunked ones, appear against the Jews than toward any other subject; so I find myself putting more work there in spite of my broader interests. On the same linked page, I just started listing my corrections of Quran misquotes, and they seem to come up a whole lot less often than Talmud misquotes for some reason. I'm equal opportunity.
Now why do you suppose people would go on claiming a man gave a hateful speech after he had a stroke when they've been presented with evidence he couldn't have? My best explanation is that people who do that are likely to be shilling for Jews by making anti-Semitism look stupid. If you're not shilling for the JIDF, you would agree that the Popoff quote looks like an inappropriate source for a good researcher to use in determining his actual position, and not just retreat to other quotes and misunderstandings. The record shows I'm happy to criticize the Jews and the state of Israel, but there's so much more false criticism out there that there's little opportunity for constructive criticism.
When I said your quote about souls was accurate and need not be challenged: he stands or falls on what he did say.
He did not give any speeches in 1994 because he had had a stroke and became incommunicative in 1992. Please read what I write.
The fact that Popoff published a good guess as to goals to be accomplished doesn't mean Schneersohn agreed with those goals; he stands or falls on what he did say.
The Talmud does not say "Jews should murder and enslave goyim worldwide" and cannot be sourced to that effect. It does describe a secondary status for those who do not agree with beliefs of Judaism, and it's very interesting in comparative religion to see similarity with other faiths' treatment of outsiders, but you said you're not interested in details like that. If you want to get into specifics we'll need to agree on how to determine who wrote a text and what it actually says instead of making wild inferences that also happen to support prior bias.
Yes, Deut. 7:6, 14:2 KJV says Israel is a "holy people" and "special/peculiar people", and as a Christian I believe the Bible. Most recognize how this applies to spiritual Israel, the church. The spiritual promises don't apply to national Israel, and the national promises don't apply to spiritual Israel. National promises of Israel are like those given in the Bible to many other nations, for instance that Egypt would always remain a people. I point out that the promises to national Israel include both the best and the worst of the other national promises, related to their behavior. It's not Zionist to say that Egypt, Israel, Syria, Jordan and others have national promises in the Bible and these always come true. None of this gives any special right to Israel as Zionists propose; I simply agree each people has its own right to self-determination, including the Palestinians. So far the Palestinians used that right to elect Hamas, so we'll see if they come up with a better idea.
I came to Scored to share deep research on areas where I have some experience, and I speak here about government, taxation, textual analysis (Q), religion, conspiracy, whatever comes up. I correct errors across the board when I'm aware and have something constructive to say. Funny thing, as I pointed out in the hoax article, more errors, and more easily debunked ones, appear against the Jews than toward any other subject; so I find myself putting more work there in spite of my broader interests. On the same linked page, I just started listing my corrections of Quran misquotes, and they seem to come up a whole lot less often than Talmud misquotes for some reason. I'm equal opportunity.
Now why do you suppose people would go on claiming a man gave a hateful speech after he had a stroke when they've been presented with evidence he couldn't have? My best explanation is that people who do that are likely to be shilling for Jews by making anti-Semitism look stupid. If you're not shilling for the JIDF, you would agree that the Popoff quote looks like an inappropriate source for a good researcher to use in determining his actual position, and not just retreat to other quotes and misunderstandings. The record shows I'm happy to criticize the Jews and the state of Israel, but there's so much more false criticism out there that there's little opportunity for constructive criticism.