Interesting that the majority who died during covid were people who knew we used to see yellow light from the sun.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
Great question! The math depends on your frame of reference and I don't have accurate data worked out, but it's not that gigantic. Due to lightspeed decay it used to be a lot less than 8 minutes away. It's tangible enough but there is definitely projection involved. It is not a black hole (u/Dps1879), that's Sagittarius A*, which figures prominently in Enoch and Jude. (It's okay for flat earthers to believe in black holes, the big psyop is the dark matter and dark energy.)
Okay your way off . Once he realized we're not on a globe and we're not in space and all these galaxies are actually much smaller than we're told then you can get on the right track. Until then you are running down the wrong rabbit hole.
By the way I'm not a flat earther just because I don't fall for the globe. Most of the flat earth content and the flat earth model is psyop to keep you off the trail. Still you're more advanced than most at least you understand that things aren't what they're told
Did I deny any of this? Did I affirm we're on a globe or in space or that galaxies are as large as we're told? I'd be happy to correct myself. On the general point, Doppler coloration sounds very intriguing, just hard to measure.
I'll work on the model. For me it's easier to start with a separate model of a 1D Flatland earth in a 2D membrane, that should get the projection right for our actual dimensions.
No you didn't say that. But the fact that you were talking about maybe less than eight light seconds away made me assume that you still believe that the solar system is a real thing. The Sun even though it's not technically an object can still be approximated using Pythagorean theorem. You need two points on the ground at the same time. So you call up a friend who lives A long ways away east or west, preferably if you hundred miles but ideally a thousand miles or more. and You both measure the sun's angle to level at the same moment. Use those angles to approximate using triangle math to estimate the distance to the Sun. You'll find that it's only a few thousand miles away.
As for it being a projection it can only make sense because if the Sun was an object it would not have a 24-hour sun in Antarctica during December. Which numerous people have apparently witnessed, So we should believe it's true. Ideally I would like to verify for myself but that's just not possible. So the only other explanation is that the sun acts like a rainbow in that it's an optical illusion. This would also explain why sometimes people see two suns. So, the sun is probably A projection of energy coming from an outside source. I came across different theories of how this could be. But it's highly speculative.
The model that I'm working from assumes two planes. One is the ground we are standing on. And the other is the star field which rotates above us on a celestial year which does not coincide exactly with the Suns or the moons solar year.
Starfield is not totally flat just like the Earth is not totally flat. there's depth. I believe the wandering stars, aka planets, Are in a lower level of density created by the area that we call atmosphere, and thus the "planets" and able to move in the patterns we observe. While the fixed stars are locked in high density energy.
Yeah, your first paragraph describes the math and the warp.
Not sure what the second paragraph is about, objects usually do appear all 24 hours, it's the disappearance that's harder to explain (refraction). The sun does channel energy and direct it to the earth and the moon and there are several cold/hot phases of the transfer of this energy that I don't fully understand, so I'm open to a wormhole being behind it. But most days I call the sun an object, a light transmitter.
I would agree with a "field" of stars with some depth, seeing as the planets constitute a field with depth. Lower density for the planets also makes sense in this frame of reference, I'll need to calculate that in. However then the "fixed" (celestial-year) stars, having higher density, also have higher mass than their size would imply to those who believe in standard physics.
An important part of the model is: How far can you go into the earth before you hit something else? Presumably if the firmament has a limit (as indicated), there would also be a "deepest" hell beyond which one cannot go. Perhaps this is blocked by the Planck distance.