Interesting that the majority who died during covid were people who knew we used to see yellow light from the sun.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
Did I deny any of this? Did I affirm we're on a globe or in space or that galaxies are as large as we're told? I'd be happy to correct myself. On the general point, Doppler coloration sounds very intriguing, just hard to measure.
I'll work on the model. For me it's easier to start with a separate model of a 1D Flatland earth in a 2D membrane, that should get the projection right for our actual dimensions.
No you didn't say that. But the fact that you were talking about maybe less than eight light seconds away made me assume that you still believe that the solar system is a real thing. The Sun even though it's not technically an object can still be approximated using Pythagorean theorem. You need two points on the ground at the same time. So you call up a friend who lives A long ways away east or west, preferably if you hundred miles but ideally a thousand miles or more. and You both measure the sun's angle to level at the same moment. Use those angles to approximate using triangle math to estimate the distance to the Sun. You'll find that it's only a few thousand miles away.
As for it being a projection it can only make sense because if the Sun was an object it would not have a 24-hour sun in Antarctica during December. Which numerous people have apparently witnessed, So we should believe it's true. Ideally I would like to verify for myself but that's just not possible. So the only other explanation is that the sun acts like a rainbow in that it's an optical illusion. This would also explain why sometimes people see two suns. So, the sun is probably A projection of energy coming from an outside source. I came across different theories of how this could be. But it's highly speculative.
The model that I'm working from assumes two planes. One is the ground we are standing on. And the other is the star field which rotates above us on a celestial year which does not coincide exactly with the Suns or the moons solar year.
Starfield is not totally flat just like the Earth is not totally flat. there's depth. I believe the wandering stars, aka planets, Are in a lower level of density created by the area that we call atmosphere, and thus the "planets" and able to move in the patterns we observe. While the fixed stars are locked in high density energy.
Yeah, your first paragraph describes the math and the warp.
Not sure what the second paragraph is about, objects usually do appear all 24 hours, it's the disappearance that's harder to explain (refraction). The sun does channel energy and direct it to the earth and the moon and there are several cold/hot phases of the transfer of this energy that I don't fully understand, so I'm open to a wormhole being behind it. But most days I call the sun an object, a light transmitter.
I would agree with a "field" of stars with some depth, seeing as the planets constitute a field with depth. Lower density for the planets also makes sense in this frame of reference, I'll need to calculate that in. However then the "fixed" (celestial-year) stars, having higher density, also have higher mass than their size would imply to those who believe in standard physics.
An important part of the model is: How far can you go into the earth before you hit something else? Presumably if the firmament has a limit (as indicated), there would also be a "deepest" hell beyond which one cannot go. Perhaps this is blocked by the Planck distance.
It would mean lower mass actually. Think about how fast the stars have to move. They rotate above Earth they need a lot of energy to move a larger mass so it's likely the mass is very small. Same goes for the planets, probably very small mass again because of the velocity they have to move so far and quickly. That said the Sun being a projection can move fast. And the moon could be a projection also explains why it moves fast. That's the stars and the planets could also be projection. Just light moving from an outside source. Like when you use a small mirror to reflect light. You barely have to move the mirror but the light of its reflection has no mess other than photons and can move Great distances almost instantly just by changing the angle of your mirror. So perhaps the stars son and moon are merely just photons. Or excited plasma irradiated by an exterior force that could be stationary. Based on Earth but beyond the ice wall.
There have been numerous attempts to go deep into the ground to find what I don't know maybe the limit kind of like operation fishbowl. As for hell being down there I don't agree. I think hell is part of the religions psyops. It's not that I don't believe in devine, I just don't believe in the versions that are presented through the various religions that are here. I believe there's a scientific explanation for spirituality and the afterlife. But I digressed because you mentioned hell.
I do think it's more mysterious What is beneath us. Hard to imagine infinite ground beneath us. Seems that there would be an end to the floor and perhaps that leads to another space with stars and then another level of another Earth. Maybe there are infinite levels of Earth stars and atmosphere Above us and below us. And maybe laterally land extends for infinity. There's too much speculation to ever draw conclusion.
But why are we all here. Even if we are Just economic slaves or a livestock of some kind. Why would the overlords that control this world be here? Why does spirituality exist at all?
Oh, that's a factor my model doesn't include. It's a good Plato's cave analogy, but I think the cave door is not the same as the perimeter portal. To me the refractive index causes any projected light from beyond the ice wall to have a different path so we'd be able to track it as a separate (searchlight) phenomenon and not just a single projection. Different models have different boundaries and sometimes they're isomorphic and sometimes not. I haven't had the speed and mass be issues for an excited plasma approach, but then my numbers are just spitballed. I'm still going with the wormhole.
Well, I was just able to run a calculation that the quantum nature of the universe means the earth cannot be more than 616,000 km deep. However that's only a first approximation and a better model would yield a smaller number: WIP. There is a quantum boundary beyond which action becomes meaningless; the boundary above us seems similar, and as I said the joining of these two manifests in refraction in the air.
However, the other universes would be reached not by drilling or rocketing but by connection in other dimensions, which is much more efficient. So even if they really are connected in Euclidean 3-space they would still be more rightly considered as connected in higher-D.
Every lord and slave is accountable each on his own level: lordship and slavery are merely different degrees on a spectrum of liberty, lords have slightly higher freedom. Freewill exists for the purpose that Good be done freely (not robotically), which requires that a certain amount of evil be permitted for a certain period, limited to that which the universe can bear. (Black hole theory actually informs this, because black holes contain bearable entropy, not unbearable.) The purpose of spirituality is then this: