You're engaging in linguistic revisionism like the establishment does. "Artificial intelligence" has been talked about for over 80 years and the definition hasn't changed. It was never about consciousness or whatever you're trying to make it about. It was always about machines being able to perform tasks that could previously only be done by human intelligence.
It was always about machines being able to perform tasks that could previously only be done by human intelligence.
So, CNC or washing machine is an "AI" for you? :) :) :) Fascinating.
OK, you are a good example of so called "magic thinking". You don't want to know how things work and swallow any shit marketing put between your ears. I could imagine how many briges you bought.
You could repeat marketing bullshit of corporations all day long, but that will not turn stupid and barely useful ANNs into AI in any measure.
There is no any magic. There is only technology you don't want to understand.
I don't think washing clothes manually involves any higher cognitive functions, although the way the machine does it could involve some kind of analysis that in previous times would have required human intelligence. So then we would say the washing machine has AI in it. Of course there will always be gray areas just as there are with who counts as a mentally competent human.
I don't see where I'm employing any "magic[al] thinking". I have studied how AI's work, but it sounds as though you haven't since you keep talking about consciousness as though that has ever been relevant to AI.
Obviously, only from that stupid marketing articles from all that Google and other corps.
If you ever had a chance to actually try to understand how things works, say, writing your own ANN or playing with code of existing ones, then you would never tell that crap and had a clear understanding that any ANN is in no way more intelligent than a wall light switch or water pump relay.
Using something without looking inside and reading stupid marketing articles does not mean you understand shit.
Conscious, sentience, unpredictability, will and all that stuff are unseparable part of intelligence. It is you who are into lingustic revisionism for the sake of whitewashing all that paid liars from corporations and MSM who run all that AI hype.
Look, you even try to attribute intelligence to washing machines, in your attempts to support that stupid fearmongering narrative that "corporations build datacenters to create a god from a machine". They are not. It is impossible to create any intelligence using stupid and 100% definitive systems of equations programmed with linear programming using only "good programming practices" as beaten hard into the brains of anyone who was hired by corporations. But it is perfectly possible to create a total surveillance system using all that datacenters. Talking about non-existing AI instead of total surveillance is a collaborationism with the globohomos, who are the real and only customer of that surveillance datacenters.
I never said anything about my knowledge coming from marketing articles. I have actually taken courses on things like machine learning and LLM's. Are you projecting your own ignorance onto me?
You're using "artificial intelligence" in a different way to everybody else on the planet. Nobody is saying that your idea of AI is going to happen. What people are saying is that machines are going to be able to do everything that humans do with their intelligence.
And that is obviously going to be a disaster for the human race because humans are going to be powerless compared to robot police, endless AI propaganda, AI taking their jobs and all the weapons of mass destruction that AI-driven science is going to discover. But you want to ignore what is obviously coming and stick to your own magical thinking that because AI is never going to be conscious it's nothing to worry about.
You're engaging in linguistic revisionism like the establishment does. "Artificial intelligence" has been talked about for over 80 years and the definition hasn't changed. It was never about consciousness or whatever you're trying to make it about. It was always about machines being able to perform tasks that could previously only be done by human intelligence.
So, CNC or washing machine is an "AI" for you? :) :) :) Fascinating.
OK, you are a good example of so called "magic thinking". You don't want to know how things work and swallow any shit marketing put between your ears. I could imagine how many briges you bought.
You could repeat marketing bullshit of corporations all day long, but that will not turn stupid and barely useful ANNs into AI in any measure.
There is no any magic. There is only technology you don't want to understand.
I don't think washing clothes manually involves any higher cognitive functions, although the way the machine does it could involve some kind of analysis that in previous times would have required human intelligence. So then we would say the washing machine has AI in it. Of course there will always be gray areas just as there are with who counts as a mentally competent human.
I don't see where I'm employing any "magic[al] thinking". I have studied how AI's work, but it sounds as though you haven't since you keep talking about consciousness as though that has ever been relevant to AI.
Obviously, only from that stupid marketing articles from all that Google and other corps.
If you ever had a chance to actually try to understand how things works, say, writing your own ANN or playing with code of existing ones, then you would never tell that crap and had a clear understanding that any ANN is in no way more intelligent than a wall light switch or water pump relay.
Using something without looking inside and reading stupid marketing articles does not mean you understand shit.
Conscious, sentience, unpredictability, will and all that stuff are unseparable part of intelligence. It is you who are into lingustic revisionism for the sake of whitewashing all that paid liars from corporations and MSM who run all that AI hype.
Look, you even try to attribute intelligence to washing machines, in your attempts to support that stupid fearmongering narrative that "corporations build datacenters to create a god from a machine". They are not. It is impossible to create any intelligence using stupid and 100% definitive systems of equations programmed with linear programming using only "good programming practices" as beaten hard into the brains of anyone who was hired by corporations. But it is perfectly possible to create a total surveillance system using all that datacenters. Talking about non-existing AI instead of total surveillance is a collaborationism with the globohomos, who are the real and only customer of that surveillance datacenters.
I never said anything about my knowledge coming from marketing articles. I have actually taken courses on things like machine learning and LLM's. Are you projecting your own ignorance onto me?
You're using "artificial intelligence" in a different way to everybody else on the planet. Nobody is saying that your idea of AI is going to happen. What people are saying is that machines are going to be able to do everything that humans do with their intelligence.
And that is obviously going to be a disaster for the human race because humans are going to be powerless compared to robot police, endless AI propaganda, AI taking their jobs and all the weapons of mass destruction that AI-driven science is going to discover. But you want to ignore what is obviously coming and stick to your own magical thinking that because AI is never going to be conscious it's nothing to worry about.