If your question contains a false assertion as a premise is it worthy of being answered directly?
I asked the important question here, one which shows there is no contradiction. It would only be a contradiction if I were to engage in scapegoating or dehumanizing of a given race, which did not happen.
But my second question exposes the hypocrisy of those upset by my post.
I could have made up a believable answer for you, but I chose to ask you the Question instead, and you chose not to answer it.
If your question contains a false assertion as a premise is it worthy of being answered directly?
I asked the important question here, one which shows there is no contradiction. It would only be a contradiction if I were to engage in scapegoating or dehumanizing of a given race, which did not happen.
But my second question exposes the hypocrisy of those upset by my post.
I simply asked you to explain yourself. Can you not do that?
I clearly have already, and you still haven't.