If agitation (inception towards death); then empowerment (life)...it's the N'T which tempts one to ignore what all DOES to each one within.
You are the denier.
De-nial aka the division of nothing (suggested information) within everything (perceivable inspiration).
Free-will-of-choice describes how denial works by analysis...guywholikesDjtof2024 labels another denier, hence a synthesis.
You deny the fakeness of your word games
Real implies ones response to all...fake implies shaped within real, while held onto. Game implies ignoring given by taken a chance...like for example the chance to hold onto any fakery (suggested) shaped within reality (perceivable) like holding onto words within sound.
Reality. That word games are inferior.
Re-al (response to all)...words and games are shaped within all to trick one another to craft spells and play games. Falling for spell-craft tricks one into a gamble/game called reason (inferior vs superior).
Notice that within reason...one side turns against the other side. Reality implies ones sight (life) in-between two sides (inception/death)...one cannot see, hence not two sides but one process giving each one within sight.
I'm not a wordist like you. I mean a desk.
a) "In the beginning was the word; and the word was with God, and the word was God"...that's where one derives meaning from. Meaning implies taking a measurement aka mentally holding onto a word, while ignoring that God aka sound/sanus (entire; whole; all) moves and cannot be held onto.
Turns out that your meaning has over a hundred different interpretations; meanwhile...sound implies the origin of any internal differentiation aka incantation (enchanting by uttering magical words).
So it doesnt agitate then?
You are the denier. You deny the fakeness of your word games.
Reality. That word games are inferior.
I'm not a wordist like you. I mean a desk. Not the word called "desk".
Inb4 "Blah blah mean imples blah blah to mean mental blah blah...." and "Oh, "ist ism" etc means this and that"
Nope. Your word games conflict with reality.
How does one do that?
If agitation (inception towards death); then empowerment (life)...it's the N'T which tempts one to ignore what all DOES to each one within.
De-nial aka the division of nothing (suggested information) within everything (perceivable inspiration).
Free-will-of-choice describes how denial works by analysis...guywholikesDjtof2024 labels another denier, hence a synthesis.
Real implies ones response to all...fake implies shaped within real, while held onto. Game implies ignoring given by taken a chance...like for example the chance to hold onto any fakery (suggested) shaped within reality (perceivable) like holding onto words within sound.
Re-al (response to all)...words and games are shaped within all to trick one another to craft spells and play games. Falling for spell-craft tricks one into a gamble/game called reason (inferior vs superior).
Notice that within reason...one side turns against the other side. Reality implies ones sight (life) in-between two sides (inception/death)...one cannot see, hence not two sides but one process giving each one within sight.
a) "In the beginning was the word; and the word was with God, and the word was God"...that's where one derives meaning from. Meaning implies taking a measurement aka mentally holding onto a word, while ignoring that God aka sound/sanus (entire; whole; all) moves and cannot be held onto.
b) This page features translation of the word "desk" to over 100 other languages... https://www.indifferentlanguages.com/words/desk
Turns out that your meaning has over a hundred different interpretations; meanwhile...sound implies the origin of any internal differentiation aka incantation (enchanting by uttering magical words).
Let's make it simpler...if the word was God, then why are there over a hundred incantations for the word God... https://www.indifferentlanguages.com/words/god
Watch this and notice the line (sound) remains the same; no matter what's being shaped (words) within it... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6t8g6ka4W0
If you view God as creator, then how could the "blah blah" of anything created not also carry God within it?
Consent...consensus
Nope vs yep...a conflict of reason. Ignorance always betrays itself.
By permitting others to re-do perceivable sound into suggestible words.