Complete denial it is then. Not much point discussing further or sharing any studies with you. You already know any study that contradicts you is "garbage".
But somehow new, undiscovered way of RF interaction with a matter didn't pop up yet .
Exactly my point, you're stuck in the physicist's trap. You demand something that isn't required to show harm, an underlying mechanism. There are some proposed underlying mechanisms, but it's not yet clear. However the harm is still clear regardless. That's all there is to it.
Exactly my point, you're stuck in the physicist's trap.
And to "untrap" I, obviously have to believe in some unproven and poorly written garbage.
No, thank you. I don't need that unscientific shit to know that modern cellphone infrastructure, including social media is harmful for people. I don't need to refer to some authority to understand the harm and how exactly, and by whom it is done to the people.
You demand something that isn't required to show harm
Harm of what exactly? How do you know it is RF, if no any RF parameters measured and even RF presence is not proven?
There are some proposed underlying mechanisms, but it's not yet clear.
So no proof that such mechanisms exist. Case closed.
If a scientist don't care about what is really happens in his experiment, then he is not a scientist.
However the harm is still clear regardless.
Even if we don't take into account that none of studies you believe in was independently replicated, you still don't want to know harm of what exactly was studied. Just like that "scientists" who published their papers.
Interesting, that you are obviously trying not to convince me that phones are harmful, because I already know that, and seems that I know much more about that than you, but to convince me to believe in some papers written by some ignorant people who actually don't know shit about things they write about.
Do you understand that you are trying to do exactly same harm, corporations and authorities do using phones? Force people to blindly believe in some narrative, referring to some "experts". Looks like you are on the same side. It does not matter what narrative is pushed, the main thing is to break critical thinking and force subject to blindly believe some "authority".
Complete denial it is then. Not much point discussing further or sharing any studies with you. You already know any study that contradicts you is "garbage".
Exactly my point, you're stuck in the physicist's trap. You demand something that isn't required to show harm, an underlying mechanism. There are some proposed underlying mechanisms, but it's not yet clear. However the harm is still clear regardless. That's all there is to it.
And to "untrap" I, obviously have to believe in some unproven and poorly written garbage.
No, thank you. I don't need that unscientific shit to know that modern cellphone infrastructure, including social media is harmful for people. I don't need to refer to some authority to understand the harm and how exactly, and by whom it is done to the people.
Harm of what exactly? How do you know it is RF, if no any RF parameters measured and even RF presence is not proven?
So no proof that such mechanisms exist. Case closed.
If a scientist don't care about what is really happens in his experiment, then he is not a scientist.
Even if we don't take into account that none of studies you believe in was independently replicated, you still don't want to know harm of what exactly was studied. Just like that "scientists" who published their papers.
Interesting, that you are obviously trying not to convince me that phones are harmful, because I already know that, and seems that I know much more about that than you, but to convince me to believe in some papers written by some ignorant people who actually don't know shit about things they write about.
Do you understand that you are trying to do exactly same harm, corporations and authorities do using phones? Force people to blindly believe in some narrative, referring to some "experts". Looks like you are on the same side. It does not matter what narrative is pushed, the main thing is to break critical thinking and force subject to blindly believe some "authority".
Ahahaha. Pure denial. Ok.