Both, both are terrible.

That's what false dialectics do to the brain. Both Islam and Judaism are bad, antichristian and want to destroy you, you idiot. Islam is based on Judaism and I literally wrote that in the comments here. Who do you think Muslims worship? It's a satanic cult for degenerate retarded rock lickers that is promoted in the west by powerful interests as an antithesis to talmudism. Well, it's not.

What judaism teaches

Those are misquotes, medieval opinions, and distortions. This was the first source I used to get accurate Talmud quotes so its debunks appear in the main post and the actual text appears in those sources that have "1" within the [brackets].

jews believe they are to attain world domination over the goyim

In exactly the same way Christians and Muslims "believe" they are to attain world domination over unbelievers.

jewish law says only jewish women can be raped

Semantic in that Israelis think sexual assault of a noncitizen is a lesser crime than rape of a citizen. While there is a strong moral precedent that all rape is equally horrendous, there is also a valid point that practical prosecution might focus more on the same act being perpetrated against citizens than against noncitizens, and reflecting that in punishment lengths. The fact that the legal semantic sounds incorrect because its language is unhelpful is no different than the practice of any other statutory construction anywhere else.

talmud quotes (you can rape a girl as long as she is under 3; goyim are slave cattle and you can kill them, etc.)

The post is from Pranaitis, who is a decent source but who here is not quoting the Talmud but medieval sources. It looks like I didn't even include Zohar 1:38b-39a because it was so weak, just an ordinary speech against idolatry that is never said specifically to include or exclude Christianity (Jews are left to judge Christianity for themselves without direct guidance). Similarly, the second source, which is more properly called "Mishneh Torah, Foreign Worship and Customs of the Nations 10", is only against idolatry and is regarded as more egregious for its advice of not putting one's own life at risk to save a known idolator's life. There is no Talmudic passage where Christianity is directly judged by majority rule (as opposed to an individual opinion).

The Talmud passages that state that rape of a girl 3 or under is not publicly prosecuted the same way as for older girls so as to protect her marital status (e.g. Ketubot 11b), that Gentiles are called animals in Scripture (e.g. Yevamot 61a), and that murder of a Gentile is prosecuted under Noah's laws and not Moses's (e.g. Sanhedrin 57a), are handled with accurate quotes.

wars are the jewish harvest of Christian souls

That is a hoax (#8), there was never a "Reichorn" as chief rabbi of France. The ultimate source is a fictional novel, Biarritz by Hermann Goedsche (pen name John Retcliffe), 1868, indicating what Goedsche wanted people to believe Jews were plotting.

This quick review doesn't comment on the links I didn't check.

I trust you're willing to remove hoax misquotations from your boilerplates and replace them with verified quotations, and to modify characterizations of Talmud and of medieval sources to indicate their proper place in comparative religion. There is plenty of criticism of the Talmud to go around without resorting to misquotation and distortion that doesn't account for the actual historical status of Jewish, Christian, or Roman culture.