"the camps were not public knowledge during the war"
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (114)
sorted by:
In terms of the general spiritual picture, I understand if you want to throw around memetic symbols like "109" and "Remphan" and so on in the sense that they convey archetypes to you. My point is that the archetypes don't have their greatest success unless they are rooted in verifiable truths as opposed to just this week's batch of memes. So I'm not denying you your big picture, but I do challenge the use of it to make specific truth claims about events that we can have sufficient knowledge of. So I'll try to take it in that sense.
Obviously Greater Israel recalls Solomon's reign from Nile to Euphrates and greater things than that. As a Christian, I too aspire to rule the world, and I tell people I already do because Jesus shares his current throne with me now. So I don't quail about others' claims to the same, they will either be proven right in one kingdom or one claim will be defeated by another.
I have no problem with the idea that many Rothschild family members are satanists and look forward to reading your link in more detail. That's just one family (the link also mentions the Barings) and there are many satanic works, as I point out Jesus mentions seven in Revelation 2-3, not just one. But haven't I linked you my study on hexagrams? They have many meanings and their cooption by satanists doesn't serve to paganize everyone who uses them, as I just told someone else. Because you're going for archetypes I won't pester you with the individual quibbles as I did in the links. Yeah, so Israel claims to be run by the hexagram principle, just as "El Salvador" claims to be run by the Savior principle, etc. The only way to tell who's right is to keep testing one principle against another.
Your link makes brief reference to British Israelitism, but I don't think that's what you mean about the lost tribes. If you're just talking about an archetype in which Ezekiel's prophecy of two sticks means that satanist Rothschilds will become united with other satanists, well, no biggie for me, satan bows to me, i.e. to Jesus in me. But what else would the lost tribes mean other than new ground for the current Israel to claim original jurisdiction over?
I say "reported" because the Received Text is well-known and a fine basis for beginning historical study. If someone wants to prefer Thomas or Enoch, I respect that because it'll connect in time (I'm partial to Odes of Solomon myself). I've had great success for 5 years here piercing the veil of obfuscation about history and getting to reality. Of course being one with the principle of the universe (Jesus) doesn't hurt in that process.
The "offer" Jesus gives (using Ann Coulter's trope, "If you can find a better offer, take it!"), is eternal life and freedom from all evils. The cost is that I gave up my own soul in exchange for all things. Lots of people are selling their souls these days, but it only works if the one you sell to has covenanted with you to retain your ownership in him. All other soul-buyers are busy manipulating and milking you and forbidding your independent claims. So it's a good offer (not referring to the person, but to the words he spoke). If you have something better, share.
Because I have one commitment (Jesus as Truth), I make one request of those who propose something to be understood, namely that it submit to Truth. If it's flatly contradictory (not just paradoxical on a process toward greater harmony), then it's not true. I'll be happy to probe any paradox you propose and to seek to navigate it without contradiction. But I do insist on noncontradiction. You can start anytime you like.
Yeah, the Gospel of Thomas (a book) is a report. If you want to go with archetypes then the other Gospels will do fine too. Archetypally, the gospel receiver is deathless, the Master teaches and the student becomes Master-like, seeking and finding is eternal, etc. I have found, I find every day, and I am still finding, and that's the way it should be short of apotheosis. (If you're claiming apotheosis yourself, which I use very technically, it's likely that you don't mean what I do and that what you claim is already something I also have found.) Looking forward to what you're willing to share further.
Just because it's obvious to you doesn't make it right. The Greater Israel Project originated with Isaac Newton, a high-degree Freemason and an occultist. Remember I said the first Freemason we know of was Nimrod.
When Newton's estate was donated to the University of Cambridge, university representatives were not interested in his theological writings and refused to accept them. Which is interesting since these were most of the writings belonging to Sir Isaac Newton. He dedicated his life to decoding biblical prophecy to force the Second Coming (or the messianic age in judaism). Today we refer to this as the New World Order, which is actually the Old World Order at the time of Nimrod.
But many were interested in these manuscripts including Albert Einstein. "While the formative development of Newton’s lasting physics works must remain shrouded in darkness, because Newton apparently destroyed his preparatory works, we do have in this domain of his works on the Bible drafts and their repeated modification" - Einstein. September 1940, Saranac Lake
So cutting to the chase .... who do you trust?
What gate would you like me not to keep? AFAIK I only have one gate, and it's kept for me by Another.
I like that, let's then cut to the chase. OK. You also asked me about the Gospel of Thomas (GoT), so here it is. IMO, Yeshu (Jesus to you) taught something totally different than the great majority of so-called Christians understand & follow today. He described something profoundly inner, he taught to listen to his words and meditate on them and not to believe in a character. This way we are activating the state of consciousness. So, he offered the keys.
On the other hand Saul of Tarsus (aka Paul) a pharisee, what today we would call a jew, took the keys away (GoT Saying 39: The Keys of Knowledge). Paul created a door (or a gate since we’re talking about gatekeeping) that can only be opened from the outside. And the deception lies exactly here, perhaps that’s where the word “gatekeeping” should come from. Yeshu said “listen to my words”, Paul says “believe me of who Yeshu is”. This change seems small & insignificant, in reality is monumental, it changes everything. And Paul had help from the system. The words of Paul today form most of the books of the New Testament. Hundreds of manuscripts, including Gospels, and religious writings, were considered merely Apocrypha, not part of the accepted canon of Scriptures.
When you focus on the words you work your inner self. When you focus on the person, even Christ, you depend externally. And that’s where the addiction comes from and it matters. "That which you have will save you if you bring it forth from yourselves. That which you do not have within you will kill you if you do not have it within you." – GoT Saying 70
Yeshu gave us a message of spiritual autonomy, which is very dangerous to any system of power. A slave with inner light does not fear death, a peasant with a sense of divine stature does not accept being owned by the system or someone else, and a whole nation moved by inner courage & character it’s not possible to control. Paul replaces this with belief and hands interpretive power back to the system (authority, the Church or Rome). Paul shifts the center of experience and creates a new kind of structure. A structure that will grow much faster as a community than any individual autonomy. You could say Paul was the original architect of what today we call social media.
Paul was very familiar with an ancient Greek art of using words not to seek truth but to construct reality. Paul takes Yeshu’s message of spiritual autonomy and redirects/reconstructs it as a message of spiritual submission. 😭
So I don't see the problem. Here I am seeking the words of Yeshu, and I have them in print in many approved and disapproved sources, and also in my heart, and I know how to reconcile them, and they are life, and I'm enjoying the seeking and finding. What we've been discussing is mostly historical points, where I'm busy focusing on what happened (because Yeshu doesn't divorce me from reality), and my reading is that you're focusing on overall messages and narratives based on "understanding Yeshu" in some way that very few do. Now fiction has power to help us understand up to a point, but truth has power too, and unadmitted fiction (deception) has no power because it loses more power overall than it gains. So whether you want your narratives to be admitted fictions or truths, I'm okay with that. But then there shouldn't be any conflict between seeking Yeshu and my making statements like "Analysis of Grosser reveals 12 modern nations Jews were expelled from as well as regions of several others".
So I appreciate your sharing, and I seek to integrate what you've said. And yet obviously Yeshu better integrated for himself all the keys he shared with others than others did, so there's a sense in which he's always beyond us, his words are always capable of more meaning than we've realized. Where's the dispute then, if any?