"the camps were not public knowledge during the war"
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (91)
sorted by:
Project 2025 is an anti-freedom, anti-1A coup of democracy built on lies to satisfy the fragile ego of a bunch of Christians who can't accept that their ideology is in decline.
I have never shared false information. Everything I've said has been true. You want to talk about ridiculous asides, how about JG5 and his buttbuddies likening opposing natalism to opposing the idea of birth itself? Like we all can't see that I'm clearly talking about the coercive global narrative pushed by Elon Musk's money and the occupied government of the United States, which has reportedly linked natalism with national security promises. So, if you don't bend to the will of Christcucks, America will not defend you in war.
I hope it backfires and everyone chooses Belt and Road over the natalist occupation.
Funny .... unaware of the difference between information and opinion.
Funny .... unaware ridiculous antinatal aside about what you believe to be someone else's ridiculous aside.
To answer, you do seem pretty opposed to birth itself, since I've asked you how people reproduce in your ideal world and you only reply with "imagine no religion" and just let people rut like animals and the education of children will just happen spontaneously without anyone working to do it. That's so globalist it's pathetic. And unaware.
You're actually a real communist? Like you're 21 in college or something? That would explain the atheism and the illogic and the gaslighting and the anti-Americanism, but not the single-issue focus. Look, man, whatever bad person hurt you, it wasn't worth you destroying yourself afterward and getting your data nuked over a narrative that has always looked to me like flat earth, i.e. a larp. You rarely speak as if you care about your core belief, but only as if you care that it keeps sliding the forum away from actual conspiracy research.
Here's your chance to say not only "everything I say is true" but also that you want to pursue truth so much that you're willing to lay all your assumptions on the line for it. Because I have. There's only one Truth that I cannot offer up for negotiation, namely the Truth that holds me and refuses to release me, the Person of Jesus Christ who I have safely entrusted myself to. I can put any proposition on the line except him because only he can release me from himself. If he wants me to be a communist, gung ho! I am the most open-minded of all because it's impossible to have fewer nonnegotiables. (Ya gotta serve somebody.) You don't demonstrate that passion. And if you did it would change the negative perception of you here that you seem to care about.
It's not an opinion. They openly declare their desire to censor voices that are "against the traditional family". They fundamentally do not believe in the First Amendment and seek to subvert it.
The same way they did before retarded natalists started paying people to? It's really not rocket science here, natalism has only been scraped off the corpse of the Soviet Union since Hungary's pro-pedo government took over.
No, I just want to see the US effort to blackmail the world to support Elon's pedo cult fail in a way that will force him out of the discussion. If countries choose to ally with the CCP instead of forcing natalism on populations that never asked for it, America will have to choose between natalism and global hegemony.
I'm not going to spoonfeed you information. You're not even asking a question, you're just speaking random tangents.
You say everything you say is true but also you're not going to spoonfeed me how P25 is pro-censorship and anti-1A despite the illogic of that position.
A quick check shows that P25 opposes CISA and FCC for what it views as censorship. It also is antiporn and argues that is not censorship or against 1A because porn isn't protected speech. Now that's a hot issue, but not one that's so cut-and-dry that your opinion is automatically obvious. But if you're pro-porn you're pretty globalist and pro-satanist by definition. IMHO. Do minors have a right to download whatever porn terabytes they can sneak around their parents? No, but my argument wouldn't be 1A, it would be that a person's 14A right to maintain his household permits him to destroy porn that his child snuck around him. You see, we have family structures for a reason, it's called training the next generation, the Swiss used to be able to tell you about it.
I already agreed with you that the state stealing tax dollars and diverting them to any subsidized activity du jour, whether effing their wives or just the taxpayers, is the evil in the first place and contravenes the Constitutional intented limits. If you only made sense you'd have me agreeing with you on the cause of removing all government-subsidized activities, that's what Constitutionists believe. But you don't propose an alternative. The alternative to taxation is easy, it's called retaining the fruits of your labor instead of having them stolen. But you have no alternative other than rutting and an agnosticism about all family matters that amounts to deprecation and thus globalist-led extinction.
Don't tell me you prefer B&R and then deny being a communist, that's illogical, even though I did (and continue to) take the opportunity to riff. You're not on the side of the current American plan, which is the best one of my lifetime despite its flaws, and you're not on the side of Truth; you're on the side of defaming Trump connections irrationally.
Now if you don't like my seeking to answer the topics you raise in some sequential order, I'll return you, as I do with people, to my one question: "Is your ... system subject to objective verification outside standards of truth or are you just here to turn everything into misogyny?" I don't think you've answered because you show you don't know the difference between objective verification and your own opinion. As if you read the one and translate it into the other without realizing the process or what is lost in translation. It takes a real intelligent person to see it happening and to know the difference (verbum sat).
If you just have a "cause" that's so important that it calls for destroying the richest man and replacing his view with nothing, you're just another politico pulling levers, who happens to be on this site and not elsewhere. What I have is Truth. It corrects me when I need. I don't need to sweat whether I'm PC in my "cause". The Truth is that if Elon is evil he should be destroyed and if not he should be upheld. But to say Elon is a pedo because he has several kids, which I believe you've said, is not Truth nor pursuit of Truth, it's just politicking. I hadn't worked up the contempt for your position to start warning you that I might drop out of the conversation, but typing that last sentence is bringing up in me the familiar feeling that I should start cutting any conversational losses I have and leave you considering wallowing in freakish misery forever.
Nothing you said was relevant to my point, so I'm going to have to go point by point, in bold, so you can't misdirect.
Project 2025 is anti-1A because they openly stated their desire to silence those speaking "against traditional families"
Project 2025 are not aiming to ban porn, that implies a stopping point. Their true aim is to create a Social Credit System built on Digital ID created because of the "threat of porn", to deny the childless access to any recreation. We can already see the groundwork for this being laid in TX.
This is because natalism has already been proven to not be able to compete in the free market. They can only push birth rates higher through coercion and threats (OBBB, current US military alliance policy) as well as removing alternatives from the playing field.
Elon Musk is a pedophile because he went to Epstein Island, as did most of the natalist cult, in what's "totally a coincidence."