"the camps were not public knowledge during the war"
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (90)
sorted by:
You say everything you say is true but also you're not going to spoonfeed me how P25 is pro-censorship and anti-1A despite the illogic of that position.
A quick check shows that P25 opposes CISA and FCC for what it views as censorship. It also is antiporn and argues that is not censorship or against 1A because porn isn't protected speech. Now that's a hot issue, but not one that's so cut-and-dry that your opinion is automatically obvious. But if you're pro-porn you're pretty globalist and pro-satanist by definition. IMHO. Do minors have a right to download whatever porn terabytes they can sneak around their parents? No, but my argument wouldn't be 1A, it would be that a person's 14A right to maintain his household permits him to destroy porn that his child snuck around him. You see, we have family structures for a reason, it's called training the next generation, the Swiss used to be able to tell you about it.
I already agreed with you that the state stealing tax dollars and diverting them to any subsidized activity du jour, whether effing their wives or just the taxpayers, is the evil in the first place and contravenes the Constitutional intented limits. If you only made sense you'd have me agreeing with you on the cause of removing all government-subsidized activities, that's what Constitutionists believe. But you don't propose an alternative. The alternative to taxation is easy, it's called retaining the fruits of your labor instead of having them stolen. But you have no alternative other than rutting and an agnosticism about all family matters that amounts to deprecation and thus globalist-led extinction.
Don't tell me you prefer B&R and then deny being a communist, that's illogical, even though I did (and continue to) take the opportunity to riff. You're not on the side of the current American plan, which is the best one of my lifetime despite its flaws, and you're not on the side of Truth; you're on the side of defaming Trump connections irrationally.
Now if you don't like my seeking to answer the topics you raise in some sequential order, I'll return you, as I do with people, to my one question: "Is your ... system subject to objective verification outside standards of truth or are you just here to turn everything into misogyny?" I don't think you've answered because you show you don't know the difference between objective verification and your own opinion. As if you read the one and translate it into the other without realizing the process or what is lost in translation. It takes a real intelligent person to see it happening and to know the difference (verbum sat).
If you just have a "cause" that's so important that it calls for destroying the richest man and replacing his view with nothing, you're just another politico pulling levers, who happens to be on this site and not elsewhere. What I have is Truth. It corrects me when I need. I don't need to sweat whether I'm PC in my "cause". The Truth is that if Elon is evil he should be destroyed and if not he should be upheld. But to say Elon is a pedo because he has several kids, which I believe you've said, is not Truth nor pursuit of Truth, it's just politicking. I hadn't worked up the contempt for your position to start warning you that I might drop out of the conversation, but typing that last sentence is bringing up in me the familiar feeling that I should start cutting any conversational losses I have and leave you considering wallowing in freakish misery forever.
Nothing you said was relevant to my point, so I'm going to have to go point by point, in bold, so you can't misdirect.
Project 2025 is anti-1A because they openly stated their desire to silence those speaking "against traditional families"
Project 2025 are not aiming to ban porn, that implies a stopping point. Their true aim is to create a Social Credit System built on Digital ID created because of the "threat of porn", to deny the childless access to any recreation. We can already see the groundwork for this being laid in TX.
This is because natalism has already been proven to not be able to compete in the free market. They can only push birth rates higher through coercion and threats (OBBB, current US military alliance policy) as well as removing alternatives from the playing field.
Elon Musk is a pedophile because he went to Epstein Island, as did most of the natalist cult, in what's "totally a coincidence."
I have no idea what you mean. You're quoting something without citation. The only relevant reference to silencing in the Mandate for Leadership is footnote 39 to page 552 where a school board was silencing critics.
Not in evidence.
Logical fallacy because you appear to define natalism as only being government control and thus not the free market at all.
Not going to argue for or against that one because I haven't seen the evidence. Not relevant to your point.
Anyway, my point was about pursuit of truth, but what you're doing instead is traditional internet debate without care for truth. It's all so tiresome.
They are not going to outright say these things. I can't believe I have to explain that. Same as their little birth rate swipe in the national security report is an obvious statement that countries must adopt natalism or lose US alliance. Project 2025 is a clandestine subversive institution, that speaks in demands that are not directly stated, but clearly marked out by their ideological bent.
What evidence do you have that it isn't the case? Digital ID has already gone far beyond adult content.
What I mean is that birth and marriage are naturally falling. Natalists will use government power to try and override people's ability to choose not to do these things. Free market already told Christians they lost, they won't accept it.
"Nice country you got there. It'd be a shame if...you didn't raise the birth rate and we were forced to declare war on you."
Anti-America propagandists will be loving all this fuel for their statements. Trump is the worst President there ever has been and likely the worst there ever will be unless Vance cheats his way into the White House.
You lost my interest.