Nothing you said was relevant to my point, so I'm going to have to go point by point, in bold, so you can't misdirect.
Project 2025 is anti-1A because they openly stated their desire to silence those speaking "against traditional families"
Project 2025 are not aiming to ban porn, that implies a stopping point. Their true aim is to create a Social Credit System built on Digital ID created because of the "threat of porn", to deny the childless access to any recreation. We can already see the groundwork for this being laid in TX.
This is because natalism has already been proven to not be able to compete in the free market. They can only push birth rates higher through coercion and threats (OBBB, current US military alliance policy) as well as removing alternatives from the playing field.
Elon Musk is a pedophile because he went to Epstein Island, as did most of the natalist cult, in what's "totally a coincidence."
Project 2025 is anti-1A because they openly stated their desire to silence those speaking "against traditional families"
I have no idea what you mean. You're quoting something without citation. The only relevant reference to silencing in the Mandate for Leadership is footnote 39 to page 552 where a school board was silencing critics.
Their true aim is to create a Social Credit System
Not in evidence.
natalism has already been proven to not be able to compete in the free market
Logical fallacy because you appear to define natalism as only being government control and thus not the free market at all.
Elon Musk is a pedophile because he went to Epstein Island
Not going to argue for or against that one because I haven't seen the evidence. Not relevant to your point.
Anyway, my point was about pursuit of truth, but what you're doing instead is traditional internet debate without care for truth. It's all so tiresome.
They are not going to outright say these things. I can't believe I have to explain that. Same as their little birth rate swipe in the national security report is an obvious statement that countries must adopt natalism or lose US alliance. Project 2025 is a clandestine subversive institution, that speaks in demands that are not directly stated, but clearly marked out by their ideological bent.
What evidence do you have that it isn't the case? Digital ID has already gone far beyond adult content.
What I mean is that birth and marriage are naturally falling. Natalists will use government power to try and override people's ability to choose not to do these things. Free market already told Christians they lost, they won't accept it.
Project 2025 is a clandestine subversive institution, that speaks in demands that are not directly stated, but clearly marked out by their ideological bent.
"Nice country you got there. It'd be a shame if...you didn't raise the birth rate and we were forced to declare war on you."
Anti-America propagandists will be loving all this fuel for their statements. Trump is the worst President there ever has been and likely the worst there ever will be unless Vance cheats his way into the White House.
Nothing you said was relevant to my point, so I'm going to have to go point by point, in bold, so you can't misdirect.
Project 2025 is anti-1A because they openly stated their desire to silence those speaking "against traditional families"
Project 2025 are not aiming to ban porn, that implies a stopping point. Their true aim is to create a Social Credit System built on Digital ID created because of the "threat of porn", to deny the childless access to any recreation. We can already see the groundwork for this being laid in TX.
This is because natalism has already been proven to not be able to compete in the free market. They can only push birth rates higher through coercion and threats (OBBB, current US military alliance policy) as well as removing alternatives from the playing field.
Elon Musk is a pedophile because he went to Epstein Island, as did most of the natalist cult, in what's "totally a coincidence."
I have no idea what you mean. You're quoting something without citation. The only relevant reference to silencing in the Mandate for Leadership is footnote 39 to page 552 where a school board was silencing critics.
Not in evidence.
Logical fallacy because you appear to define natalism as only being government control and thus not the free market at all.
Not going to argue for or against that one because I haven't seen the evidence. Not relevant to your point.
Anyway, my point was about pursuit of truth, but what you're doing instead is traditional internet debate without care for truth. It's all so tiresome.
They are not going to outright say these things. I can't believe I have to explain that. Same as their little birth rate swipe in the national security report is an obvious statement that countries must adopt natalism or lose US alliance. Project 2025 is a clandestine subversive institution, that speaks in demands that are not directly stated, but clearly marked out by their ideological bent.
What evidence do you have that it isn't the case? Digital ID has already gone far beyond adult content.
What I mean is that birth and marriage are naturally falling. Natalists will use government power to try and override people's ability to choose not to do these things. Free market already told Christians they lost, they won't accept it.
"Nice country you got there. It'd be a shame if...you didn't raise the birth rate and we were forced to declare war on you."
Anti-America propagandists will be loving all this fuel for their statements. Trump is the worst President there ever has been and likely the worst there ever will be unless Vance cheats his way into the White House.
On his wife and in elections. Guess who owns Dominion now.
You lost my interest.