What a stupid claim. By your logic, a kid isn't free to choose which blocks to put in which holes just because..... HE PUT A SQUARE BLOCK IN A SQUARE HOLE.
How can one claim without choosing a side like stupid vs intelligent? Where does free-will-of-choice took the "intelligent" opposition to the "stupid" claim?
The entirety of my comments
COM (together) MENT(mind)...nature's entirety separates each mental entity from one another. A jew suggests comment-sections to tempt gentiles together, which represents a call for remembrance aka commemoration.
a kid isn't free to choose which blocks to put in which holes
It's the suggested block puzzle, which tricks a kids free will of choice to bind itself to a game by ignoring choice given for chance taken.
Furthermore...the fitting blocks into hole/whole game implies tikkun olam (repairing the world by putting together). Notice furthermore that the kids' FREE development is being tempted by BLOCKS aka blocking free.
Claiming does NOT contradict seeing.
DOES implies given; NOT implies taken....nature does before one comes into being; only afterwards can one take "not" from one another.
A child doesn't know what NO means until someone chooses to domesticate the child into yes vs no reasoning aka using denialism (no) to tempt compliance (yes)...a trick where both sides tempt free will of choice to bind itself willingly.
Mission/mittere - "to send" aka sending information by influence. Influencer cover a wide variety of topics to blanket audiences under information.
Nature doesn't cover...it reveals by moving inspiration through each being.
Nature inspired the entirety of Scored to nuke your worldview.
Nature implies entirety; being implies entity...only within entirety can each entity come into being.
One cannot be "free" will of choice by claiming a worldview. Claiming contradicts seeing.
The entirety of my comments are true.
What a stupid claim. By your logic, a kid isn't free to choose which blocks to put in which holes just because..... HE PUT A SQUARE BLOCK IN A SQUARE HOLE.
Mud pool reef. Fish contradicts u/free-will-of-choice.
Claiming does NOT contradict seeing.
How can one claim without choosing a side like stupid vs intelligent? Where does free-will-of-choice took the "intelligent" opposition to the "stupid" claim?
COM (together) MENT(mind)...nature's entirety separates each mental entity from one another. A jew suggests comment-sections to tempt gentiles together, which represents a call for remembrance aka commemoration.
It's the suggested block puzzle, which tricks a kids free will of choice to bind itself to a game by ignoring choice given for chance taken.
Furthermore...the fitting blocks into hole/whole game implies tikkun olam (repairing the world by putting together). Notice furthermore that the kids' FREE development is being tempted by BLOCKS aka blocking free.
DOES implies given; NOT implies taken....nature does before one comes into being; only afterwards can one take "not" from one another.
A child doesn't know what NO means until someone chooses to domesticate the child into yes vs no reasoning aka using denialism (no) to tempt compliance (yes)...a trick where both sides tempt free will of choice to bind itself willingly.