Hitler believed the earth was old. Not young. PROVE ME WRONG.
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
I once thought that, then I realized that to stay silent meant I denied "By one man death entered the world." You can't have a miilion-year earth rising from no humanity to humanity without Darwinism. There were no millions or billions of years of death prior to the first man.
Maybe that wasnt DEATH as we know it today. Maybe its possible that young earth is just as much of a misunderstanding as Darwinism is.
Maybe evolution and creation are compatible. Sin on earth could not have existed until the understanding of actions, that is, until a being became able to choose their actions beyond instinct. Animals do not sin when then hunt.
It's something one could consider, and Skil just said much the same theory. But God created the world with animals and man in it very good, he didn't create a world designed with death for millions and billions of years. The attempt to reread these passages is only about 200 years old, coincident with atheistic evolution. Young earth has been the unified testimony of virtually all people at all times until a couple British declared war on it. If you'd like to put forward your positive evidence for billions of years, I posted a thread.
Im pretty sure you and OP are the same guy on 2 accounts, not that I care just wanted to point it out.
And you are skipping my point to continue arguing for yours although I'm not arguing against young earth theory. I'm arguing against your attempt to gatekeep white nationalism behind something irrelevant like a 150-year old politician's religion. And your attempt to gatekeep an entire religion behind something irrelevant like geology.
How old is the earth? Could be 13 billion years, could be 5000 years, could be more or less or in between, we cant know the accurate number. But the OBJECTIVE TRUTH is that it doesn't matter. We know this.
I just said it's understandable that alt accusations must fly in a forum of conspiracist anons, no offense, the truth will out.
Um, what I say (not necessarily what u/guywholikesDjtof2024 says) is that whites have every right to nationalism like any other people, and that those who larp as stupid white nationalists, such as the account OP ridicules, are harming the cause of white nationalism that they pretend to advance, by making its proponents look like idiots. If you want to promote white nationalism per se (whites having self-determination rights over their nations and immigration and naturalization), please feel free, you might even do it with occasional reference to the NSDAP, but not with reference to their motives which were, as stated in OP, about the possibility of all peoples ceasing to exist in time. Christians admit no such possibility, and neither ultimately can white nationalists. (The second voluble white nationalist account here, whom I named, constantly dooms and says it's already over, but falls prey to this same observation of being a lampoon of the true white nationalist.)
If it's irrelevant, there's no need to argue it. You regard my views as gatekeeping because I speak them plainly, while your views are "seems" and "maybe" (which I permit you) but you then turn to attack mine. The point of "prove me wrong" does align with those who think it irrelevant by showing that no evolutionist can prove young earth wrong. If we pursue Jesus as Lord, it won't matter because we won't care much about details and he will guide us into all truth in time.
So the evidence says to me that Darwinism does not "historically slightly align more than" historical, scientific creationism. The curse changed the nature of animals so that they hunt; Isaiah says the curse will be lifted and they will cease to hunt again. No species ever died of eating good plants.