98% of Ugandan paternity tests come back as not the father
(www.independent.co.uk)
Comments (26)
sorted by:
Remember when the Christians said it was "anti-white propaganda" to say that marriage is a joke and women's loyalty is non-existent?
Now what?
Oh? How many of them? Where? Anti-human, more like it.
Funny how Dresden goes silent for 23.5 hours, and you 3 days - then both wake up at the exact same time 🤔
The irony of the guy who cannot pass 15 upvotes saying that...
15, 15, 13.
You're too obvious.
[Known Alts] + 4 > Vote Score
We're playing Le Mans Ultimate together.
I didn't even see this post until JM brought it up.
Oh, right. We can trust you 🤣
You want me to prove I own it or something?
How many paternity tests were done?
How big is the sample size?
How were the results gotten?
"About 95 per cent of those coming for DNA tests are men, but more than 98 per cent of the results show these men are not the biological fathers,” Simon Peter Mundeyi, a spokesman for the Ministry of Internal Affairs, told reporters in July."
Holy shit 98%!! That's insane
Hmmm... lower than expected.
That doesn't sound statistically even possible. More anti-family propaganda.
It makes less sense in Uganda than any other country. You aren't getting away with that in the village, the husband will kill you with a machete.
Women's nature is inherently awful. We've been telling you tradcucks for years.
Irony. You retards have been saying women's lack of loyalty is due to "targeted anti-white propaganda" for years now.
Now we see it's their nature - again - and you'll deny it - again.
No, their lack of loyalty is because of their sin nature.
Now you admit humans are NOT "inherently good" as so many fellow athiests have said, yes?
Everyone's**
Yes, you've hit an actually good point (by accident).
Atheism is held back by political barriers from speaking certain truths. No true follower of science should ever say women are inherently good - we know their innate biases, their lack of humanity towards the out-group and the evolutionary reasons why they were always going to be pieces of shit.
Because saying they are inherently bad people is verboten, it gives religion a few contradictions to latch onto.
Everyone right of Bush is, apparently.
Saying anyone is inherently bad is verboten in today's culture. Who wants to hear that they're fallen sinners who need Salvation?
?
Neither side of politics can speak negatively of women. The tradcucks won't and the leftists certainly won't.
It might be, but it's still true. Women are inherently bad people and data continues to support this conclusion. Not in the "original sin" sense, but in the sense that they lack a mental mechanism for basic empathy.
Atheists always stop short of admitting women are awful people for political reasons despite that being the current position of scientific research.
The Right has plenty of times. There's been no particular reason to or need to. And definitely not the way you do it. Example: its-ho-math, all the anti-feminism articles, books, etc. printed and published, and more.
Yes in that sense.
Some do some don't. CEOs of companies also have this issue. The elites who rule countries DEFINITELY have this issue.
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARK57t3po/remember-when-the-french-governm/c