Yes, you've hit an actually good point (by accident).
Atheism is held back by political barriers from speaking certain truths. No true follower of science should ever say women are inherently good - we know their innate biases, their lack of humanity towards the out-group and the evolutionary reasons why they were always going to be pieces of shit.
Because saying they are inherently bad people is verboten, it gives religion a few contradictions to latch onto.
It makes less sense in Uganda than any other country. You aren't getting away with that in the village, the husband will kill you with a machete.
Women's nature is inherently awful. We've been telling you tradcucks for years.
Irony. You retards have been saying women's lack of loyalty is due to "targeted anti-white propaganda" for years now.
Now we see it's their nature - again - and you'll deny it - again.
No, their lack of loyalty is because of their sin nature.
Now you admit humans are NOT "inherently good" as so many fellow athiests have said, yes?
Everyone's**
Yes, you've hit an actually good point (by accident).
Atheism is held back by political barriers from speaking certain truths. No true follower of science should ever say women are inherently good - we know their innate biases, their lack of humanity towards the out-group and the evolutionary reasons why they were always going to be pieces of shit.
Because saying they are inherently bad people is verboten, it gives religion a few contradictions to latch onto.
Everyone right of Bush is, apparently.
Saying anyone is inherently bad is verboten in today's culture. Who wants to hear that they're fallen sinners who need Salvation?
?