not at fault

Only during fall (inception towards death) can one rise (life)...therefore each one's at fall/fault. It's blaming one another which tempts one to ignore that.

Thankfully, we don't consider the word of a nazi, but we can actually read the Bible and confirm that Jesus was a rightous jew.

That's why all his apostles were jews.

And that's another example of how you, and your nazi Hindu swastika beliefs are wrong, and will always be wrong.

Here is almost the complete text, with a preface you don't have before your recording begins "World War I broke out".

Freedman argues that Wycliffe 1345 found "there was no English word" for Judean so he used a word phonetically spelled "gyu" for Judean; but etymologists now know that English forms like "Iewe" date back to the 1000s, from French 800s "Ju" which simply elides Latin "Judaeus", so his argument is false. He backhandedly admits this is "just the same as we call a laboratory a 'lab'", but there is no distinction in any language between the contraction and the older form, and no evidence of corruption.

He continues, "So-called Jews ... weren't Jews, as I just explained to you. They were Eastern Europeans who'd been converted to Talmudism. There was no such thing as Judaism. Judaism was a name given in recent years to this religion known in Bible history as Torah." This is false because the Bible calls the religion Ioudaismos or Judaism. The Eastern European converts, such as they were, became full Judahites (Jews) and practiced full Judaism. If the religion had ever been called Talmudism as if to distinguish itself from Ioudaismos, there would have been a breaking point where it left Judaism and became something else, but the history is continuous and unbroken.

He earlier elaborated, "The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per cent of the world's population of those people who call themselves Jews, were originally Khazars." The proportion may be accurate but is now 75%; the claim as if they are all Khazar-descended is false. He refers to importing "thousands of these rabbis" for "maybe ten to twenty million people"; this is false because the most liberal estimate for the army's size is only 100,000. As I showed in the earlier link, the Khazars could not have become Jewish without heavy genetic admixture from existing Judahites (Jews). He doubles down, ignoring his 94% number, saying without justification, "There isn't one Jew who's a Semite. They're all Turkothean Mongoloids." Seeing as Freedman is defaming his own ethnicity as unscrupulous, it seems clear that he cannot be taken as the most reliable source himself.

The Bible says in 42 places that Jesus was born King of the Jews, was the Jewish Deliverance out of Elsewhere, was the Jew held by the nations, was in Jewish jurisdiction, kept Jewish customs, was a citizen of the Jewish nation, identified as a Jew, was called a Jew, was ruled in court as a Jew, died a Jew, was the Jewish Messiah, had myriads of Jewish believers, led a Jewish sect, followed Jewish law, and was a spiritual Jew too.

I'm not going into the depths of the "fault" of the wars because obviously they were cabal-directed and also relied on the choices of the public actors. That's tangential to the current argument for which this was posted.