Yep because it's gentiles who gather in synagogues who reject Jesus Christ.
Actually yes! That's precisely what Ignatius describes. Jesus wasn't referring to all synagogues, but a new practice in two cities. Ignatius makes clear they were uncircumcised Judaizers, and reading between the lines of Ignatius implies they asked the local Jews if they'd have permission to be called a "synagogue", and so they ended up being called "Jews" too by these liberal birth Jews who broke the tradition of every other Jewish community in the world. If Jesus said something like "all synagogues are of satan" that would be different, but he said this "synagogue" was of satan implying others weren't. Basic logic and basic history.
First, he wasn't talking about anyone in context other than Smyrna and Philadelphia. Second, if his words are applied to others, the pattern must be the same: Ignatius showed the issue was Gentiles (non-Jews) proclaiming Judaism (Judaizing), but the Khazars converted and stayed Jews for centuries before their Khazar polity disappeared, so they were really Jews.
If you say the Khazars lied for centuries and didn't believe the Judaism they lived and died in, this gives Jews the right to say American Christians lie and are neither Christians nor Americans, because the outsiders know better what the real experience is than the insiders.
In fact, you're trying to be Jewish yourself: you're culturally appropriating the only-Jewish practice of deciding what a Jew is.
The canard goes around and around, at first I asked for sources but nobody had or admitted any. It's clearly a conspiracy and psyop. Thanks Joe, you've given me the ability to compare anti-Khazars with flat earth and Mormonism: they all argue for a "fun" narrative in spite of any facts and have no interest in the truth but only the feels of sticking with the narrative. All I need for total ridicule is some good naming and meming. Thank you for continuing your buffoonery to the point where it may explode in the whole subversive movement's face. Hmm.
I'm quoting Jesus. They "say they are Jews, and are not". He being Jewish was allowed to comment on what all Jewish tradition had held (that the uncircumcised are not Jewish). You don't get to judge the self-identified Jews from outside any more than you permit them to judge your identity from outside. Pretty simple. If they are united in polity and history there's no evidence they're not a branch of the same Ioudaios people Jesus was from. Nobody except Joe is even attempting to justify the althist. It's all a big larp that falls apart like a spiderweb when touched.
Jesus said the synagogue of satan were not Jews. Read the link. He was referring to Gentiles.
There is no credible theory that we get to say today's "Jews" are not Jews, or else they'd have the right to say "Americans" are not Americans.
In what sense of the word?
Uh, Gentiles in the sense not Jews. Ignatius describes them as uncircumcised Judaizers.
Spiritual or physical/genetic?
Uncircumcised in both.
Yep because it's gentiles who gather in synagogues who reject Jesus Christ......oh wait.....
Actually yes! That's precisely what Ignatius describes. Jesus wasn't referring to all synagogues, but a new practice in two cities. Ignatius makes clear they were uncircumcised Judaizers, and reading between the lines of Ignatius implies they asked the local Jews if they'd have permission to be called a "synagogue", and so they ended up being called "Jews" too by these liberal birth Jews who broke the tradition of every other Jewish community in the world. If Jesus said something like "all synagogues are of satan" that would be different, but he said this "synagogue" was of satan implying others weren't. Basic logic and basic history.
He was talking about khazars larping as a religion, not gentiles you subversive hook nose kike.
First, he wasn't talking about anyone in context other than Smyrna and Philadelphia. Second, if his words are applied to others, the pattern must be the same: Ignatius showed the issue was Gentiles (non-Jews) proclaiming Judaism (Judaizing), but the Khazars converted and stayed Jews for centuries before their Khazar polity disappeared, so they were really Jews.
If you say the Khazars lied for centuries and didn't believe the Judaism they lived and died in, this gives Jews the right to say American Christians lie and are neither Christians nor Americans, because the outsiders know better what the real experience is than the insiders.
In fact, you're trying to be Jewish yourself: you're culturally appropriating the only-Jewish practice of deciding what a Jew is.
The canard goes around and around, at first I asked for sources but nobody had or admitted any. It's clearly a conspiracy and psyop. Thanks Joe, you've given me the ability to compare anti-Khazars with flat earth and Mormonism: they all argue for a "fun" narrative in spite of any facts and have no interest in the truth but only the feels of sticking with the narrative. All I need for total ridicule is some good naming and meming. Thank you for continuing your buffoonery to the point where it may explode in the whole subversive movement's face. Hmm.
Will work on it! "Othering" isn't strong enough.
Thanks for confirming u going against Christ's word.
I hope shilling for them is worth your eternal soul to you.
I'm quoting Jesus. They "say they are Jews, and are not". He being Jewish was allowed to comment on what all Jewish tradition had held (that the uncircumcised are not Jewish). You don't get to judge the self-identified Jews from outside any more than you permit them to judge your identity from outside. Pretty simple. If they are united in polity and history there's no evidence they're not a branch of the same Ioudaios people Jesus was from. Nobody except Joe is even attempting to justify the althist. It's all a big larp that falls apart like a spiderweb when touched.