The real holocaust
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (54)
sorted by:
The concept was coined by Valentinus, ca. 150. Daniel Parker published a Two Seeds book in 1826.
It's a beautiful church and I see that Gildas puts the founding of the insular church before 37. The second church assembly mentioned by Luke seems to be Samaria in the same decade. So I won't quibble the pious opinion, but I am bookmarking it and noting the legend. You might be interested in my [Celtic praises series](https://communities.win/search?query=celtic praise&community=christianity&sort=old).
No agenda but Jesus!
BTW, I don't believe this coming from you. I have met a lot of crypto-jews in my life to know better.
We're anons, you're free to suspend belief. I do have a partial testimony. You can judge me by my works. What Jesus has shown me, I stick to, and you are free to be his tool to correct me where I'm wrong; just be prepared for my comparing it against what I think he's shown me.
I don't know you or your works. All I can tell from your replies, you're defending the jews and their talmud.
I have no idea what Jesus has shown you. But, as long as you're happy, I'm OK with that.
Do you believe the Jews should be presented unavoidably with the message of Jesus Christ in case there are some who will believe? Or perhaps you believe the two-seed doctrine that they are essentially inhuman and unworthy of evangelism? In the latter case, it would be very strange that Jesus and a million of the first Christians came from the Jews, so it would seem that evangelism in hope seems the better approach.
In evangelizing the Jews, we must remove stumbling blocks and particularly inaccurate statements, which prevent our message from being accepted. If we want to criticize the Jews or the Talmud, we must stick to the facts and not join those who have literally been playing the telephone game for centuries and misquoting each other's views on what the Jews or Talmud say. It's my belief that some who pretend to criticize the Talmud here are actually being paid to make Talmud criticizers look dumb and to win sympathy for the Jews: because they don't criticize the Talmud for its actual problems but for things it doesn't say, so that what it does say that is problematic can be ignored too. If you're interested in truth-based criticism of the Talmud, you too should be prepared to reject false criticism of it, which weakens the reception of the true.
https://communities.win/p/141rQokAmv/
https://communities.win/c/Christianity/p/141YkrZ2mH/testimony-13-feb-22/c
Welcome to satanism!
I haven’t been able to find Two-seed movement attributed to Valentinus. But, I found this and I see his followers refer to themselves as “Christians”, and also as “the spiritual seed,” an allusion to their distinct and privileged spiritual identity. Now, this makes a lot of sense to me. I came across Valentinus a few years back when I was looking at the Nag Hamadi library. Among the Valentinian collection of Gnostic scriptures I only read the Gospel of Philip. I’ll go back to look at the rest, especially the Gospel of Truth. Which I read even thou it doesn’t contain any firsthand accounts of Jesus’ life, it does use some similar language.
I had more luck with Daniel Parker and his book “Doctrine of the Two Seeds”. I downloaded a pdf document by Max Lee, which is actually "A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School Southern Baptist Theological Seminary" and I will read this later.
To me Jesus is the exact opposite of an agenda. He is the awakening I have been waiting for, all my life. Once I'm awake and walk with Him I have no need for an agenda, a plan or anything else. All I have to do is listen and trust what He has to say. It’s really that simple.