Marxism has no right to call itself socialism
(files.catbox.moe)
Comments (16)
sorted by:
Another one of your posts with the predictable foil character DresdenFirebomber disagreeing with you in some absurd fashion to make you look like the good / sane person.
But anyway, socialism doesn't work, whether you print notes "with interest" or not, it's the printing in the hands of an active government that is the problem. It always ends up the same way.
Can Turkey blame their hyperinflation on the Jews or is it fiscal dominance (government controlling fiscal policy)? Believe it or not a central bank is a slight improvement to that even worse situation, and neither situation is good.
Every hyper inflation can be blamed on jews.
Ok then. Sounds reasonable.
Yeah, that's the quote I was looking for!
"Marxism is not Socialism. The Marxians have stolen the term and confused its meaning. I shall take Socialism away from the Socialists. Socialism is an ancient Aryan, Germanic institution. Our German ancestors held certain lands in common .... We are not internationalists. Our socialism is national. We demand the fulfilment of the just claims of the productive classes by the state on the basis of race solidarity."
So Hitler wasn't a socialist who wanted to take property away from some and award it in the name of justice to another class, instead he was a socialist who wanted to take property away from some and award it in the name of justice to another class.
Or, in short, those other statists did it wrong but I won't.
They were the richest country in the world till the war broke out. Nice try, schlomo.
And anyone driving a Volkswagen is literally a Nazi...
To be murdered later by communists. Neck yourself, yid.
Why won’t you write a sequel to your fan fiction? I keep asking your sockpuppets and they never oblige. Why don’t you seem to know anything about me other than this one line you’ve invented out of thin air? Surely you could at least lie some more, since you lied about this in the first place.
Oh, and surely you can prove anything you say on any subject, when you’re met with direct citations to firsthand sources that prove you wrong… but you don’t? I don’t get it.
So… nothing, then. In addition to being objectively incorrect about everything you say politically, you can’t even defend your lies about other users. Thanks for confirming.