Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

0
The stormfaggots wanted to talk about Epstein for years, now the truth is coming out that natalism is the pedophile ideology of choice, suddenly they want to bury it. Fact
posted 21 days ago by DresdenFirebomber 21 days ago by DresdenFirebomber +3 / -5

Your downvotes don't change the facts or the inevitable outcomes.

Natalism will be remembered as the ideology of pedophiles.

59 comments share
59 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (59)
sorted by:
▲ 3 ▼
– SwampRangers 3 points 20 days ago +3 / -0

Why don't you link the archive then, in fact broadcast it? The internet is forever and this is the Wild West. I'd be disinclined to believe a narrative in which a Scored poster had an archive important to you and boohoo neither you nor he ensured its continuance and you can't contact him offline about it.

Obviously it didn't have crime or doxing in it, or you would have agreed with its removal.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– JosephMalta -1 points 20 days ago +1 / -2

Because then he'll push the admin to ban me next. Every time it reappears, someone gets banhammered. u/RepeatDresden2 got banned for bringing it back.

There's some deep corruption here, and it involves Kaarous and the stormfaggots. Anyone who gets too close to exposing either, disappears.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SwampRangers 2 points 20 days ago +2 / -0

You're not making sense. If the argument is that u/Kaarous committed some evil and nobody can describe it reasonably without reference to a mystery archive, it's the height of (faulty) conspiracy theory against other contributors. At a minimum you should be able to say whether it doxes him, what the nature of the accusations against him are (without luridity), and why the argument wouldn't apply that it's forum-forbidden attack. In all that I've seen I haven't been able to distinguish you from ordinary trolls using bots, and I don't believe you capable of the demonstration I ask for.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Kaarous 2 points 20 days ago +3 / -1

Oh no it's actually much simpler. He's a perverted, crossdressing autistic atheist, and like all of their kind he tries to wordspell lies into reality.

whether it doxes him

It doesn't.

what the nature of the accusations against him are

Nonexistent.

See, he's using these accusations as a post facto defense for having been sitewide banned for some actually heinous and illegal things, and he's desperate to try and recover a reputation that only existed in his imagination.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– JosephMalta 0 points 20 days ago +1 / -1

If you try hard enough, you can probably fit another buzzword on there, feminist.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 0 ▼
– JosephMalta 0 points 20 days ago +2 / -2

Kaarous made a comment in a long, protracted argument with TheImpossible1 that said that TI1 has no chance of winning his war against marriage, because he has no influence.

TI1 challenged the claim and said Kaarous was also an Internet nobody, to which Kaarous responded that he was a member of the as yet still a conspiracy theory Project 2025 authors.

TI1 ridiculed the idea, saying Project 2025 was a leftist dogwhistle and that he trusted President Trump would never listen to such retards, before eventually being proved wrong as the plague of Christian influence spread.

Fast forward to around 5/6 months ago, and he archives the conversation and pins it to his board, saying that Project 2025 shills are embedded within the site.

Kaarous threatens him with arrest and deportation using unknown influence if he doesn't unpin it and stop talking about Project 2025.

TI1 reports this threat to the admin. They do nothing. Kaarous constantly harasses TI1 with threats of deportation for "prohibited political speech".

TI1 tells me before he's banned, via email, as he doesn't trust the DM system here, that he's planning to leave the United States anyway, to an unnamed country. He keeps joking about Switzerland publicly, but I doubt that's where he actually went.

TI1 gets banned and someone close to him creates u/RepeatDresden2, after other people who got perma'd returned with alts. RD2 is added to the mod team of TI1's former community, and re-pins the post as a statement of defiance. RD2 is banned out of the blue a few days later.

TI1 returns after JG5 is allowed to, as u/DresdenFirebomber, and has me pin a statement saying he believes the admin is compromised and that speaking about Project 2025 influence gets you banned if you show the receipts. Since then, Kaarous has spewed insane theories that TI1 is an illegal alien and fled the country because of him.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Kaarous 4 points 20 days ago +4 / -0

TI1 tells me before he's banned, via email, as he doesn't trust the DM system here

Ah ha ha ha ha ha omg you thought that was a good excuse for you not being obviously the same person?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SwampRangers 1 point 20 days ago +1 / -0

So there would be no reason for a comment with u/Kaarous saying "he was a ... Project 2025 author" to have been deleted, so you'd have the link handy to copy, right?

And Unscored should have two copies of the archive at c/feminism that you can link in this unmoderated community, right?

A quick search shows nothing surprising to me, so I don't know what post you're working from. I'm also not tracking how a theory about Kaarous's alleged claims or their followup would be more credible than any other antinatalist theories. Do you actually want me to play fetch and guess the right conversation and then (likely) tell you it's not what you think? By pleading that you're afraid to give receipts yourself?

Sounds to me like Imp hated P2025 long ago and that hate has morphed into an attempt to continue to discredit anything remotely connected, to the point of breaking sitewide policy. That's an inference to the best explanation. Why should I believe otherwise?

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy