So there would be no reason for a comment with u/Kaarous saying "he was a ... Project 2025 author" to have been deleted, so you'd have the link handy to copy, right?
And Unscored should have two copies of the archive at c/feminism that you can link in this unmoderated community, right?
A quick search shows nothing surprising to me, so I don't know what post you're working from. I'm also not tracking how a theory about Kaarous's alleged claims or their followup would be more credible than any other antinatalist theories. Do you actually want me to play fetch and guess the right conversation and then (likely) tell you it's not what you think? By pleading that you're afraid to give receipts yourself?
Sounds to me like Imp hated P2025 long ago and that hate has morphed into an attempt to continue to discredit anything remotely connected, to the point of breaking sitewide policy. That's an inference to the best explanation. Why should I believe otherwise?
So there would be no reason for a comment with u/Kaarous saying "he was a ... Project 2025 author" to have been deleted, so you'd have the link handy to copy, right?
And Unscored should have two copies of the archive at c/feminism that you can link in this unmoderated community, right?
A quick search shows nothing surprising to me, so I don't know what post you're working from. I'm also not tracking how a theory about Kaarous's alleged claims or their followup would be more credible than any other antinatalist theories. Do you actually want me to play fetch and guess the right conversation and then (likely) tell you it's not what you think? By pleading that you're afraid to give receipts yourself?
Sounds to me like Imp hated P2025 long ago and that hate has morphed into an attempt to continue to discredit anything remotely connected, to the point of breaking sitewide policy. That's an inference to the best explanation. Why should I believe otherwise?