There absolutely was direct evidence of those claims but you're muddying the waters by saying there also needs to be an admission of malicious intent. There's a clear difference between "this primary source says X" and "this primary/secondary source is best explained by X".
With the pyramids the primary source is how the stones are laid which doesn't tell you what technology was used and you have to use inference to the best explanation, which is often wrong and the two of us can't even agree on the best explanation yet.
I ain’t muddying shit nigga, show me direct evidence of any of the things you claimed there is direct evidence for. You won’t be able to. Because it’s all based on indirect evidence and inference.
Just watch the fucking documentary or miss me with this shit.
No need to be rude. I did already tell you what the direct evidence is for a couple of them, which you could look up.
In Fauci's emails one of his aides draws his attention to their funding of EcoHealth Alliance in relation to the origin of Sars-CoV-2 and Fauci had meetings with a number of other people like Jeremy Farrar about the origin and some of them expressed by email that there's no way it could have been of natural origin but then a few days later signed the Lancet statement that it was zoonotic. Is that 100% proof it came from the lab? No, but it's direct evidence that not only did Fauci and co know it likely came from a lab with their funding and that their public statements did not represent their actual views or knowledge, implying they were covering up the truth.
The moderna patent containing the exact sequence which supposedly evolved naturally in Sars-CoV-2 is also strong evidence from primary sources of collusion between Moderna and the creation of the virus, even if there's a 1 in a trillion chance the two sequences matched by chance. Ralph Baric receiving vaccine candidates is further direct evidence.
Do I have to go through all the other conspiracies I mentioned?
No, actually, i told you what the direct evidence showed (which wasn’t what you initially claimed it showed), then you just reiterated that in your most recent comment here.
Do I have to go through all the other conspiracies I mentioned?
Nope, they were all uninteresting, all you have to do is watch the megalith documentary I’ve linked 5 times now. And you don’t even have to do that, it’s just what’s required for the conversation to continue
There absolutely was direct evidence of those claims but you're muddying the waters by saying there also needs to be an admission of malicious intent. There's a clear difference between "this primary source says X" and "this primary/secondary source is best explained by X".
With the pyramids the primary source is how the stones are laid which doesn't tell you what technology was used and you have to use inference to the best explanation, which is often wrong and the two of us can't even agree on the best explanation yet.
I ain’t muddying shit nigga, show me direct evidence of any of the things you claimed there is direct evidence for. You won’t be able to. Because it’s all based on indirect evidence and inference.
Just watch the fucking documentary or miss me with this shit.
No need to be rude. I did already tell you what the direct evidence is for a couple of them, which you could look up.
In Fauci's emails one of his aides draws his attention to their funding of EcoHealth Alliance in relation to the origin of Sars-CoV-2 and Fauci had meetings with a number of other people like Jeremy Farrar about the origin and some of them expressed by email that there's no way it could have been of natural origin but then a few days later signed the Lancet statement that it was zoonotic. Is that 100% proof it came from the lab? No, but it's direct evidence that not only did Fauci and co know it likely came from a lab with their funding and that their public statements did not represent their actual views or knowledge, implying they were covering up the truth.
The moderna patent containing the exact sequence which supposedly evolved naturally in Sars-CoV-2 is also strong evidence from primary sources of collusion between Moderna and the creation of the virus, even if there's a 1 in a trillion chance the two sequences matched by chance. Ralph Baric receiving vaccine candidates is further direct evidence.
Do I have to go through all the other conspiracies I mentioned?
No, actually, i told you what the direct evidence showed (which wasn’t what you initially claimed it showed), then you just reiterated that in your most recent comment here.
Nope, they were all uninteresting, all you have to do is watch the megalith documentary I’ve linked 5 times now. And you don’t even have to do that, it’s just what’s required for the conversation to continue