Stuff They Don't Want You to Know by Ben Bowlin et al. gives several theories that do meet this test, namely the government admitted them later, including Bernays, HAARP, Tuskegee experiment, early cloud seeding, off the top of my head. Naturally they take a safe path by picking on the relatively boring ones and describing the more sensational ones without credence (such as the first man to report being contacted by MIB). They have a podcast and are wide open to discussion.
And now apparently Amelia Earhart ran a spy plane, she was kidnapped into the East with her copilot, and the government now admits it couldn't admit it and allow that conclusion for 80 years.
I guess we can add psychic powers, remote viewing, people on mars and all the other shit the government admits they’ve funded as “proven direct evidence conspiracy theories”
Or maybe the entire distinction is retarded and a red herring
Oh, I was trying to be helpful about your request for "direct-evidence-based". An official retraction is often one of the clearest evidences. But you seem to mean evidence like the rocks are there (and then everyone should come to the same interpretation of them?). The pot with copper in it really was there and really has been proven to be a functional battery, so they could've had some control of electricity for instance. But until we have objective agreement on how to view evidence the discussion is, um, restrained. I was trying to find out what the evidence was for the razor claim or for the appeal to ignorance of how it was built, but nobody wanted to summarize it, including myself, so a summary didn't happen.
Stuff They Don't Want You to Know by Ben Bowlin et al. gives several theories that do meet this test, namely the government admitted them later, including Bernays, HAARP, Tuskegee experiment, early cloud seeding, off the top of my head. Naturally they take a safe path by picking on the relatively boring ones and describing the more sensational ones without credence (such as the first man to report being contacted by MIB). They have a podcast and are wide open to discussion.
And now apparently Amelia Earhart ran a spy plane, she was kidnapped into the East with her copilot, and the government now admits it couldn't admit it and allow that conclusion for 80 years.
Golly, c/GovernmentApprovedConspiracies, sounds so fun and interesting.
I guess we can add psychic powers, remote viewing, people on mars and all the other shit the government admits they’ve funded as “proven direct evidence conspiracy theories”
Or maybe the entire distinction is retarded and a red herring
Oh, I was trying to be helpful about your request for "direct-evidence-based". An official retraction is often one of the clearest evidences. But you seem to mean evidence like the rocks are there (and then everyone should come to the same interpretation of them?). The pot with copper in it really was there and really has been proven to be a functional battery, so they could've had some control of electricity for instance. But until we have objective agreement on how to view evidence the discussion is, um, restrained. I was trying to find out what the evidence was for the razor claim or for the appeal to ignorance of how it was built, but nobody wanted to summarize it, including myself, so a summary didn't happen.
ITS 👏 IN 👏 THE 👏 FUCKING 👏 DOCUMENTARY 👏
Where in the two hours sir?