True conspiracies usually have some direct evidence. Like leaked documents, whistleblower testimony, censored research and so on. Ones that don't are usually false, like chemtrails from commercial airliners.
Hard to choose only 3. COVID had a bunch, like the virus being from the Wuhan lab with US funding but covered up as revealed in Fauci's emails, collusion with vaccine manufacturers as indicated by the furin cleavage site's exact sequence in 2016 Moderna patent and Ralph Baric receiving vaccine candidates in December 2019, fatality of the virus obviously exaggerated, positive cases deliberately inflated, vaccines safe and effective and so on. Earlier ones include the assassination of Julius Caesar, the Phoebus cartel, the creation of the Federal Reserve and the secret societies around Cecil Rhodes.
There was no “direct” (using your definition) evidence of covid 19 originating in that lab, nor that Fauci had funded research that produced covid 19, simply indirect evidence in the form of documents showing that the NIH, under Fauci, funded a group with different people overseeing it, and that group went on to fund “gain of function research on bat origin corona viruses” (something to that effect, and probably not even stated so directly) around 2014. Also I’ve never seen “direct” evidence that any of that other stuff you mention was done maliciously either. It obviously was, but -
It’s all indirect and inferences. And as much as I believe that all (what you laid out) to be the case, I don’t pretend like there is “direct evidence” of it. But it’s still obviously the case. Similar to the subject of the thread.
Your other examples are…lol… let’s stick to the last hundred years shall we? Julius Caesar lol
Regardless, like I said, watch that doc and if your opinion hasn’t changed after that, then this might get interesting.
You do realize what board you’re on right?
Anyway, get back to me when you actually watch the OP. If you still have the same opinion, that might be interesting.
True conspiracies usually have some direct evidence. Like leaked documents, whistleblower testimony, censored research and so on. Ones that don't are usually false, like chemtrails from commercial airliners.
List your top 3 direct evidence based conspiracies please
Hard to choose only 3. COVID had a bunch, like the virus being from the Wuhan lab with US funding but covered up as revealed in Fauci's emails, collusion with vaccine manufacturers as indicated by the furin cleavage site's exact sequence in 2016 Moderna patent and Ralph Baric receiving vaccine candidates in December 2019, fatality of the virus obviously exaggerated, positive cases deliberately inflated, vaccines safe and effective and so on. Earlier ones include the assassination of Julius Caesar, the Phoebus cartel, the creation of the Federal Reserve and the secret societies around Cecil Rhodes.
There was no “direct” (using your definition) evidence of covid 19 originating in that lab, nor that Fauci had funded research that produced covid 19, simply indirect evidence in the form of documents showing that the NIH, under Fauci, funded a group with different people overseeing it, and that group went on to fund “gain of function research on bat origin corona viruses” (something to that effect, and probably not even stated so directly) around 2014. Also I’ve never seen “direct” evidence that any of that other stuff you mention was done maliciously either. It obviously was, but -
It’s all indirect and inferences. And as much as I believe that all (what you laid out) to be the case, I don’t pretend like there is “direct evidence” of it. But it’s still obviously the case. Similar to the subject of the thread.
Your other examples are…lol… let’s stick to the last hundred years shall we? Julius Caesar lol
Regardless, like I said, watch that doc and if your opinion hasn’t changed after that, then this might get interesting.