True and false are at odds with one another. Change implies even, which alters into each ones different choice, which then can choose to put true and false at odds with one another.
ideas of technology
Techno/tekhnē (artifice) logy (logic; circular thinking)...the ideas another suggests become artificial idols within oneself, which then shapes true or false circular thinking.
Nature implies linear progression; each being within a potential to shape form.
innate powers
Aka power native within energy...a process of internal separation (analysis), which holding onto ideals/idols inverts (synthesis).
Technology implies the synthetic inversion of natural analysis.
Technology implies the synthetic inversion of natural analysis.
Literally!
Though I wonder, what would the natural application of natural analysis look like? What would it be called? Perhaps something like “the Way”? Or even “free will”?
what would the natural application of natural analysis look like?
a) Look/lock implies holding onto; like implies differences synthesized together...it's all perceivable separating each ones perception, which allows one to analyze what others synthesize.
b) Apply; verb - "join or combine" aka a synthesis. Ation/action implies separation into reaction aka analysis.
It's your consent to the suggested word "application" which hides analysis (cation) within synthesis (apply)...you are choosing to artificially hold together what nature sets apart from one another. I can analyze this, but not take apart your synthesis.
What would it be called?
It wouldn't. Putting a label onto something implies a synthesis...being one thing within everything implies an analytical process. You answering the call, you questioning others what to call, any you holding onto the called label...that's what inverts analysis into synthesis.
Perhaps something like “the Way”?
a) What does way (inception towards death) imply? Wanderer (life)...not a likeness, but internal differentiation aka the inert power you wrote about.
b) Perhaps implies by happenstance aka by chance. Being implies choice given by balance...only then can choice take a chance, which once again implies an inversion.
c) Being implies one thing within everything (analysis)...something implies the sum of things together (synthesis).
Or even “free will”?
Balance (even) gives and takes free will of choice (odd)...that's how nature evens the odds of being. It's OR (either, else, otherwise, as an alternative or substitute) which another exploits to tempt choice at odds with one another.
Taking the chance of even or odds implies gambling ones choice away. Only within even can there be odd..."or" inverts that.
It's your consent to the suggested word "application" which hides analysis (cation) within synthesis (apply)...you are choosing to artificially hold together what nature sets apart from one another.
Heat flows up, water flows down, this i can discern from analysis, yet don’t I, the human, still require the synthesis to decide to, and ultimately to actually produce a roofed structure which will keep the heat in and the rain out? Is that an inversion of the natural analysis or is that an example of natural synthesis?(though if I read right, such a thing doesn’t even properly exist in the framework you describe, so the question has inherent limits) - forgive the use of the word “or”
Require(ment) implies a mental inquiry among humans during the natural synthesis of each being from one another. Ones response to such inquiries represents the synthesis.
Heat flows up, water flows down
Flow directs linear...form (life) grows up (living) and down (dying) during linear flow. Only during linear flow can formed heat flow down, and formed water flow up and vice versa.
will keep the heat in and the rain out?
Will can only come into being within natures outward balance...keeping anything imbalances ones will.
ultimately to actually
Another inversion...actual through initial (inception) towards ultimate (death). That's how a reaction comes into being.
a roofed structure
Structure implies in-between roof/foundation aka as above/so below...that separation implies natural analysis, which translates to self discernment. Whatever one artificially synthesizes tempts one to hold onto it, while ignoring natural analysis.
Notice how many seek shelter from rain under a roof, yet how few leave the shelter when the rain ends...the temptation to artificially shelter grows exponentially unless resisted.
Notice furthermore that each infant gets exposed to lack of shelter, and that each elder gets exposed despite of shelter.
True and false are at odds with one another. Change implies even, which alters into each ones different choice, which then can choose to put true and false at odds with one another.
Techno/tekhnē (artifice) logy (logic; circular thinking)...the ideas another suggests become artificial idols within oneself, which then shapes true or false circular thinking.
Nature implies linear progression; each being within a potential to shape form.
Aka power native within energy...a process of internal separation (analysis), which holding onto ideals/idols inverts (synthesis).
Technology implies the synthetic inversion of natural analysis.
Literally!
Though I wonder, what would the natural application of natural analysis look like? What would it be called? Perhaps something like “the Way”? Or even “free will”?
a) Look/lock implies holding onto; like implies differences synthesized together...it's all perceivable separating each ones perception, which allows one to analyze what others synthesize.
b) Apply; verb - "join or combine" aka a synthesis. Ation/action implies separation into reaction aka analysis.
It's your consent to the suggested word "application" which hides analysis (cation) within synthesis (apply)...you are choosing to artificially hold together what nature sets apart from one another. I can analyze this, but not take apart your synthesis.
It wouldn't. Putting a label onto something implies a synthesis...being one thing within everything implies an analytical process. You answering the call, you questioning others what to call, any you holding onto the called label...that's what inverts analysis into synthesis.
a) What does way (inception towards death) imply? Wanderer (life)...not a likeness, but internal differentiation aka the inert power you wrote about.
b) Perhaps implies by happenstance aka by chance. Being implies choice given by balance...only then can choice take a chance, which once again implies an inversion.
c) Being implies one thing within everything (analysis)...something implies the sum of things together (synthesis).
Balance (even) gives and takes free will of choice (odd)...that's how nature evens the odds of being. It's OR (either, else, otherwise, as an alternative or substitute) which another exploits to tempt choice at odds with one another.
Taking the chance of even or odds implies gambling ones choice away. Only within even can there be odd..."or" inverts that.
Heat flows up, water flows down, this i can discern from analysis, yet don’t I, the human, still require the synthesis to decide to, and ultimately to actually produce a roofed structure which will keep the heat in and the rain out? Is that an inversion of the natural analysis or is that an example of natural synthesis?(though if I read right, such a thing doesn’t even properly exist in the framework you describe, so the question has inherent limits) - forgive the use of the word “or”
Require(ment) implies a mental inquiry among humans during the natural synthesis of each being from one another. Ones response to such inquiries represents the synthesis.
Flow directs linear...form (life) grows up (living) and down (dying) during linear flow. Only during linear flow can formed heat flow down, and formed water flow up and vice versa.
Will can only come into being within natures outward balance...keeping anything imbalances ones will.
Another inversion...actual through initial (inception) towards ultimate (death). That's how a reaction comes into being.
Structure implies in-between roof/foundation aka as above/so below...that separation implies natural analysis, which translates to self discernment. Whatever one artificially synthesizes tempts one to hold onto it, while ignoring natural analysis.
Notice how many seek shelter from rain under a roof, yet how few leave the shelter when the rain ends...the temptation to artificially shelter grows exponentially unless resisted.
Notice furthermore that each infant gets exposed to lack of shelter, and that each elder gets exposed despite of shelter.