That was quoting WP, same source as you. The existence of a territory with short name Palestine does not prove your assertion of the existence of a country Palestine.
Looks like this article might saliently supplement your history.
See you're still trying to pick up the pieces. I was referring to WP being your source for 1929, not WP being your source for 1938.
So I was busy reading my own selected article, very interesting, looks like the Jews have been there continuously for 3,500 years. Now Nehemiah says there were Arabs in Jerusalem led by Geshem in the 440s, so we can give them that much credit, but writings in Old Arabic only date back to the 9th century BC so I don't think we can stretch them back in the land as far as the Jews.
Unrelated add: Just as the Jews displaced the Canaanites in the 16th century BC, the Caphtorites displaced the Avvim, the first residents of Gaza, at that time too. So even for Gaza you have Avvim, Caphtorites, Egyptians, Philistines, Israelites, Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians, Greeks, Israelites again, Romans, before you get to Arab Palestinians.
See, you’re retarded, because you quoted all that shit before I ever linked to WP. Review the comment chain you fucking liar. Not to mention, the entire conversation was about Skil’s link, and the 1929 massacre only got brought up, later, to counter your absolute kikery around the word “admit”
Unrelated add: blow it out your ass, guy-(poorly)-justifying-murdering-babies
Or, I'm a time traveler and anticipate things. Since you objected to WP in the same comment in which you cited WP, I made light of it. I also wasn't using the word "admit" in any special sense, I just thought it odd that you usually don't admit the 3,200 years of continuous Jewish presence, so I made light of that too. Seeing as you like treating me lightly, I might continue doing so.
Taking your words in the most generous way, you're saying that wartime deaths count as murder (and genocide), especially when the warriors have suspect motives, and that by my not denouncing it (but waiting on external judgment) I'm justifying it. If I let myself use that approach, how easily I could demolish every argument: everyone is remaining silent about, or being incomplete in agreeing with me on, some deaths that I harp on, such as slaughter of myriads of Christians or millions of preborns, which makes everyone else a baby-murder-justifier. But you see Graph it doesn't work. Golden Rule applies, don't chew others out unless you're willing to be chewed out the same way.
I'm disappointed that I don't meet your standards for how vehemently I should condemn the IDF and Israel. Love you bro.
That was quoting WP, same source as you. The existence of a territory with short name Palestine does not prove your assertion of the existence of a country Palestine.
Looks like this article might saliently supplement your history.
Except…I was quoting Skil’s comment….which wasn’t quoting wikipedia, logic fail there champ
See you're still trying to pick up the pieces. I was referring to WP being your source for 1929, not WP being your source for 1938.
So I was busy reading my own selected article, very interesting, looks like the Jews have been there continuously for 3,500 years. Now Nehemiah says there were Arabs in Jerusalem led by Geshem in the 440s, so we can give them that much credit, but writings in Old Arabic only date back to the 9th century BC so I don't think we can stretch them back in the land as far as the Jews.
Unrelated add: Just as the Jews displaced the Canaanites in the 16th century BC, the Caphtorites displaced the Avvim, the first residents of Gaza, at that time too. So even for Gaza you have Avvim, Caphtorites, Egyptians, Philistines, Israelites, Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians, Greeks, Israelites again, Romans, before you get to Arab Palestinians.
See, you’re retarded, because you quoted all that shit before I ever linked to WP. Review the comment chain you fucking liar. Not to mention, the entire conversation was about Skil’s link, and the 1929 massacre only got brought up, later, to counter your absolute kikery around the word “admit”
Unrelated add: blow it out your ass, guy-(poorly)-justifying-murdering-babies
Or, I'm a time traveler and anticipate things. Since you objected to WP in the same comment in which you cited WP, I made light of it. I also wasn't using the word "admit" in any special sense, I just thought it odd that you usually don't admit the 3,200 years of continuous Jewish presence, so I made light of that too. Seeing as you like treating me lightly, I might continue doing so.
Taking your words in the most generous way, you're saying that wartime deaths count as murder (and genocide), especially when the warriors have suspect motives, and that by my not denouncing it (but waiting on external judgment) I'm justifying it. If I let myself use that approach, how easily I could demolish every argument: everyone is remaining silent about, or being incomplete in agreeing with me on, some deaths that I harp on, such as slaughter of myriads of Christians or millions of preborns, which makes everyone else a baby-murder-justifier. But you see Graph it doesn't work. Golden Rule applies, don't chew others out unless you're willing to be chewed out the same way.
I'm disappointed that I don't meet your standards for how vehemently I should condemn the IDF and Israel. Love you bro.