The smartest people 3
(cdn.videy.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (8)
sorted by:
u/SwampRangers is not the smartest people because he still makes believe that there is anything such as a "good jew" in 2025.
The truth is that a Supreme White Nation is better off with NO synagogue of satan jews inside of it. Anything that is good, a White man can do it better.
There is no one good, not even one. If you define "Jew" such that someone who accepts Jesus and is made good is no longer a Jew, then sure, and there would be no good Gentiles either.
Jesus being the exception, we could also say there is exactly one Good Jew in 2025. Unless we want to engage the theory Jesus wasn't Jewish, which I've shown has no traction.
ZOG gave these modern day fraud jews a nation of their own, so that they could have their own government and we could observe how righteous they were. They proceeded to carry out genocide and give complicated, wordy excuses why they blew up the school or the hospital. Always a big block of text kind of like your posts that make excuses for them.
Return Israel To Its True Aboriginal Beautiful Blue Eyed and Blonde ForeFathers. Anti-Christ Synagogue Of Satan Jew Kikes and Mohammadan Palestinians are BOTH Invaders / Colonialists Unfit To Be Our Servants. https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/17s5p5WSEo/return-israel-to-its-true-aborig/c
Hey, this is a nice article! The original Ancient DNA from Chalcolithic Israel reveals the role of population mixture in cultural transformation by Eadaoin Harney et al. 2018-08-20 in Nature does show that, based on 22 of the 600 people buried in Peki'in cave, an allele for blue eyes may have been present in 49% of the minority race represented. (Hair color isn't mentioned.)
In the Biblical view, the modern races descend from differences in Noah's three sons and their wives. The people of Peki'in would be prediluvian and their racial differences, if significant, would not be those we are familiar with but would be more homogenous and would be classified more by association indicated by artifacts than by "race". The evidence shows that these 22 people had mixed heritage among the local pottery-based Levant ("Neolithic", corresponding to Seth), pottery-based Anatolia (corresponding to Jabal and Jubal), and copper-based Iran ("Chalcolithic", corresponding to Tubalcain and Naamah). I could see a tenuous argument then that these people, to the degree they had progeny, would have contributed to all the races in Noah's group and therefore all modern races could claim heritage in Peki'in. However, this being a 4% minority doesn't tell us who the majority Levantines contributed to the most, and so the theory that they reappeared as the broad group of Semites (including notably Jews and Arabs) would be the default. It also doesn't make the minority aboriginal if their parents came from Anatolia and Iran.
The Bible tells us that the Jews and Israelites were in fact invaders and gives Moses's justification; it also shows the Ishmaelites as warlike; and it shows that Japhethites were noted for residing among those Semites. The original Caananites were Hamitic, but that is not necessarily by right either. If we were to ask who were the oldest in the region, I get Neanderthal, Qafzeh-Skhul, and Natufian, which don't seem to indicate any racial or tribal preference because pre-agricultural. (There, u/Aryan, I looked at a couple skulls that are not anatomically modern, but they don't suggest anything other than now-extinct branches of interfertile Homo sapiens.)
When Moses freed his people from slavery in Egypt, he left the niggers behind as slaves. Haha Moses was based, heh?