Sounds like the institution creating doubt is not marriage itself but the normalization of fornication. Societies that punish false accusers as one of the ordinary functions of justice do not have this problem.
I know "fornication" is ambiguous, but obviously I meant the category of normalization of adultery. If people agree on no adultery then people agree on no adultery. If adulterers are punished (and false accusers are also punished), then society is delegating to the state a certain power to preserve the good of women not cheating without consequences, and it stays restrained. Society is free not to, and to try to handle it other ways, but I don't know that any other such ways have worked better.
Says the unironic, literal cuck who got divorced by his wife and lost everything, spiralling into being a Nazi retard to avoid admitting trusting women is a bad idea LMAO.
No, I don’t remember things that weren’t said.
Not hard to read the post, retard.
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/french-men-s-insecurity-over-paternity-of-offspring-creating-a-society-of-doubt-1.773569?mode=amp
And this was in 2009, when women still pretended to have basic humanity.
Cool, they didn’t say it. The post says so. Scream for me, subhuman paid shill.
They're literally telling you that if people started asking questions, the whole rotten "institution" would come down.
Someone who denies reality so obviously must have an insecurity about the issue.
Sounds like the institution creating doubt is not marriage itself but the normalization of fornication. Societies that punish false accusers as one of the ordinary functions of justice do not have this problem.
Christians are truly paste eaters.
I know "fornication" is ambiguous, but obviously I meant the category of normalization of adultery. If people agree on no adultery then people agree on no adultery. If adulterers are punished (and false accusers are also punished), then society is delegating to the state a certain power to preserve the good of women not cheating without consequences, and it stays restrained. Society is free not to, and to try to handle it other ways, but I don't know that any other such ways have worked better.
No, what they're saying is that if trends cause people to doubt their families (like you're trying to do right now), society breaks down.
Still waiting...
He's scared.
Nearly a day of dodging the question, buddy.
And why would people doubt their families if they get tests, hmm? Tests just guarantee the truth.
The unspoken reality is, if tests were widespread, a lot of you would find out you're now cucks.
Shh, you're making too much sense and his TI82 brain just fried.
Yeah, people. Not “natalists.” Thanks for disproving your own argument, you stupid subhuman piece of shit sockpuppet!
By definition, the retards getting married are dumb fucking natalists. I guess you could also call them Christcucks, emphasis on the cuck.
So… absolutely no defense of your admittedly false claim. Got it.
You're arguing semantics. It certainly won't be us getting cucked by women, tradfaggot.
Says the unironic, literal cuck who got divorced by his wife and lost everything, spiralling into being a Nazi retard to avoid admitting trusting women is a bad idea LMAO.
I love this fan fiction. Go ahead and make up more stories.
Remember when the French government embraced Nazi occupation and illustrated jewish connections to world leaders in their museum?
o/