⬆️
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (114)
sorted by:
⬆️
I debunk Lightbringerflex's posts that proclaim unBiblical beliefs as facts.
Besides, what even is there to do? All that has been explored has been explored, right? All that's left to do is accuse people of being SALEM WITCHES, like how someone here claimed Kirk was a S.W.
That's not bad at all. Actually, quite commendable to fight the good fight.
Can you, however, show me your best examples, or example, on how you do that? If it's not a problem for you, I just want to see what kind of mod and am I voting for here.
Pretty much, yes. But there are some recent news that needs unpacking. + I doubt that everyone knows the most important news that happen right now. Even I recently (3-4 years ago) found out about graphene as nanotech used in vaccines... It's important, and since you're a Christian, did you know this news was shared on page 666 of OpenChemistry journal? (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8248920/ - you need to open the .pdf)
That's absurd for someone to claim that... But clearly it's a troll or shill... Another good reason why we need good moderation in here.
Good you believe this.
https://communities.win/u/lightbringerflex?type=post
No, they explained why. Even though it was a stretch. There is literally no benefit that would come from removing it to stifle discourse, except to help TPTB.
Alright, I know that this person exists, but I was asking for you to provide some of your examples that you particularly happy, if I can say that, so I can review them and share my honest thoughts... I hope you understand that I can look through all his posts -> Look for your comments -> Look if the topic is about Christianity -> And then review them case by case...
I think you'll help us both to review these cases, since you have them in your comments section, and you have the memory of those, so you reviewing them and providing them would be the fastest way possible for this.
Would you care to share the discussion, please? I've seen a lot of wrong sources and opinions to be convinced that I should check things for myself. I hope you understand.
Also, banning someone is not the only job of a mod. They can also gives strikes, mute, be arbiters in conflicts, etc., etc.
Banning someone is the last resort for a mod, imo. A lot of actions come before the last resort, but if someone doesn't hear reason several times and is damaging the community - they have to be banned eventually. But always starting with muting them first, they just might be in a period with strong emotions and some time off can help them cool off and think rationally again.
How would you like it if someone comes in your heated debate with someone and set some general groundrules, so a normal topic can be followed, and if someone goes over those rules, they should be disqualified from the conversation (again, this doesn't mean banned immediately).
So, considering all this information, do you still believe that having mods is muting? Or do you have another perspective and why?