⬆️
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (114)
sorted by:
⬆️
Good you believe this.
https://communities.win/u/lightbringerflex?type=post
No, they explained why. Even though it was a stretch. There is literally no benefit that would come from removing it to stifle discourse, except to help TPTB.
Alright, I know that this person exists, but I was asking for you to provide some of your examples that you particularly happy, if I can say that, so I can review them and share my honest thoughts... I hope you understand that I can look through all his posts -> Look for your comments -> Look if the topic is about Christianity -> And then review them case by case...
I think you'll help us both to review these cases, since you have them in your comments section, and you have the memory of those, so you reviewing them and providing them would be the fastest way possible for this.
Would you care to share the discussion, please? I've seen a lot of wrong sources and opinions to be convinced that I should check things for myself. I hope you understand.
Also, banning someone is not the only job of a mod. They can also gives strikes, mute, be arbiters in conflicts, etc., etc.
Banning someone is the last resort for a mod, imo. A lot of actions come before the last resort, but if someone doesn't hear reason several times and is damaging the community - they have to be banned eventually. But always starting with muting them first, they just might be in a period with strong emotions and some time off can help them cool off and think rationally again.
How would you like it if someone comes in your heated debate with someone and set some general groundrules, so a normal topic can be followed, and if someone goes over those rules, they should be disqualified from the conversation (again, this doesn't mean banned immediately).
So, considering all this information, do you still believe that having mods is muting? Or do you have another perspective and why?