⬆️
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (114)
sorted by:
⬆️
I think is fine as is
Thanks for your reply. It's more about having an acitve user around for trolls, which is worse now that it's known there's no moderation here. Also mod presence to sticky posts and organize discussion/roundtables/featured documentaries.
Conspiracies has always been a lightly modded community and I see no reason to change that.
You welcome, haven't seen anything that's a real problem personally, I mean I see some extreme rhetoric that looks like from trolls sometimes, but they usually get downvoted so whatever
I agree the board handles itself pretty well with self moderation.
based.
How so?
Can you remind me of what moderation you've seen so far?
I'm saying good with whatever light moderation, the sometimes troll extreme shit usually get downvoted so who cares.
People, who want to make this place better than it already is - that's who cares.
And also, people who are fed up with nothing being done against the shills/trolls... Just downvoting works for a time, but they make a new account, and how can you be safe from them?
And currently there isn't even a light moderation - there's no moderation... I asked you about what moderation you've seen so far, you don't reply to that... Aren't those wonderful communication skills?
And if you want to know "who cares" - it's me and other people, who actually have been here for quite some time to notice that this place is going down. Probably your 65 days in here are not enough to make you care, but someone does care.
I didn't mean to be attacking with "who cares", was debating
Can't say much moderation that I have seen. but I can't tell what moderation is done on most forum, isn't it usually done non-publically?
I'm good with wild west, think the downsides are small, but people can disagree