⬆️
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (114)
sorted by:
⬆️
I didn't mean to be attacking with "who cares", was debating
Can't say much moderation that I have seen. but I can't tell what moderation is done on most forum, isn't it usually done non-publically?
I'm good with wild west, think the downsides are small, but people can disagree
I see your point, but how do we deal with shills/trolls and no discussions to combine our efforts into a singular goal without mods?
I think moderation is necessary, but I also respect your position.
I just ignore shill/troll post mostly
Singular goal, haven't thought in that, s'pose you can request sticky for a post you think is important
I don't even know what this "request for sticky" really is, honestly...
And who am I supposed to contact without mods?
I was hoping for more action from the users in here... I guess most of you are too fed up to do anything, and I don't blame you for it... I know exactly how that feels...
But if we don't do anything, who will?
My latest idea has been to encourage likeminded people to act with unity and to ignore those who are not likeminded. This too requires critical mass and planning, because in that scenario the good are considered as being in the minority and they have a greater challenge of having unity. The difference is that, as forum members know, having levers of power and apparent majority should be handled with one set of circumspections and transparencies, and not having them should be handled with another, and even though the two are continuous their tactical difference is real. So I may get back to the community about that.
Point is, you can't request sticky without active moderators, so I propose (ad) that you vote YES on active moderators.