Do you want a make a pool? Or vote in some way for the most important news of the week?
Following Axeotl_Peotl's example, we can go for the most upvoted comment in here as the major topic that should be discussed this week. Most upvotes, or longest discussion WINS.
We can do that every week, so we can try to make this into a community. Otherwise, everyone is just sharing their views - old, new, wrong, right, etc... There is no community work being done in reality.
I know we agree on the majority of the conspiracies, but on some we disagree...
If we make a DISCUSSION posts about a certain topic and we actually manage to finalize it, then we can just copy the link to any new user that has any questions about this topic. I see this as a win for everyone of us. Otherwise, we just share known materials to veterans, who can help with a lot of information.
-
How can we activate the veterans in conspiracy research to be more active and share their information with newcomers?
-
How can we have a useful debate that actually reaches a useful and truthful conclusion?
-
How can we make this community more proactive than it already is?
We should unite our efforts to make a difference, otherwise it's every man for himself... And how has that worked in the past?
It's clear that the enemy wants to divide us, so it might be a good idea to unite in the ideas that we agree on. It seems like a good idea to at least try. I can definitely say that it worked when Axeotl_Peotl was making the pools in the past about the most important conspiracy of the week.
Rules:
-
Attack the argument, not the person.
-
Add more information to the topic, if you can.
-
Expose shills, who have no rational reason to go against any topic.
If you see a positive use for this, please share any topics that you think are relevant. A Charlie Kirk discussion, or a united thread would be very useful, but of course any suggestions would be appreciated, just say what comes to your mind as an important conspiracy topic.
We had already great discussions in here on the Lahaina fires and other topics, where users were compiling big posts that clearly showed the conclusion of a combined research (sorry, if I miss your specific example, I just forget things).
That would be an extremely useful database. If we can compile all the information in one post, someone can share it, someone can make a documentary about it, someone can research for more details...
We all have different qualities that can be useful to expose the truth to others. It is better to share them then just use them on our own. What has been achieved so far by a single individual? But if we combine our resources, we might have a real chance to wake a lot of people with extensive research and firm message that would help them conclude that the mass media is lying.
I'm sorry that I have to be the person to restart this topic, but I haven't seen anything similar in some time in here. (I don't review this forum daily, so if you've done that and I've missed it - I'm sorry). But if we decide on a day that is specifically for these discussions, we might have a real breakthrough using the brains of this community.
If you think that's a good idea - comment your best conspiracy topic.
If you think that I shouldn't start this - make a DISCUSSION post about your best conspiracy topic.
Either way, I hope you can share knowledge between yourselves in a united manner. That would certainly show the greatest result, imo.
You're fulfilling the stereotype I previously described to you by professing disbelief in something you've been shown twice. For the third time, the graphic lists 52 divisions, and the article, while retracing many of these 52 that I omitted, supplies 59 (or 60) more that were not among the 52. Of those 59, I explicitly listed 42, and referred to 17 in categories where the explicit lists appear in the link. [Add: Again I neglected to say the obvious 52+59=111.] And you're still
cryingcomplaining, without thanking me for the 139 Jewish denominations, about there not being 100 Muslim denominations, which by now is a moot point because the main point has been demonstrated clearly that major religions have many divisions without qualification.Since I enumerated and indicated where explicitly in the links to find all 250 names, I didn't bother to type out every single one. If you wish to continue failing reading comprehension on this, be my guest; if you wish to make this an issue to others, feel free, with the proviso that they may well judge you a fool for your reading comprehension.
Fun swerve to a party line. I tell everyone, Jesus said explicitly they were not Jews. You might like the historical dive into who he was really talking about; the most likely historical figure intended was Onkelos, who did convert to Judaism long after the synagogue of satan was defeated by the Holy Spirit (as Jesus prophesied) by Ignatius of Antioch. I remember you were at c/Christianity and left it over this issue, but couldn't find it easily, which is another reason I told you I was confident I'd shared Jesus with you before.
Anyway, for Conspiracy purposes, both the theory "it's the Jews", and my theory of continuous covenantalism that includes Messianic Jews, are worth discussing.
For Christianity purposes, we have different standards and you're free (as the other OP says) to divide yourself from us. Let's see. "Scott Lively didn't like Baptists and founded First Century Bible ('Swamp Rangers'), 2020 .... Neo1 didn't like Swamp Rangers and founded True Christians, 2024." You fit right in, fren. Just as you are free, I'm free to contextualize if I believe you're lying.
You do allude to the fruits of c/Christianity, where we've had prayer at least weekly all along and have never turned aside requests for help. We are working on becoming even better, and we welcome criticism, but fruit inspection requires authority similar to that of fruit grower in the first place.
Now, Neo, whether or not you receive it, again I bless you in Jesus's name, and (speaking directly) am thankful for all the personality range you've shown, from your great encouragements to your great discouragements. For station identification, my reference to time-wasters was a hint about the fact that I choose very deliberatively what and whether to respond to each objection I hear: the wise welcomes objections. There comes a time when a person responds to an objection with silence because everything has been said on that point. If you should reach that point with me, I trust we'll chat again when Paul's prophecy becomes true that we reach unity of the knowledge of the Son of God (Eph. 4:13).
I'll let that comment speak for itself.