Do you want a make a pool? Or vote in some way for the most important news of the week?
Following Axeotl_Peotl's example, we can go for the most upvoted comment in here as the major topic that should be discussed this week. Most upvotes, or longest discussion WINS.
We can do that every week, so we can try to make this into a community. Otherwise, everyone is just sharing their views - old, new, wrong, right, etc... There is no community work being done in reality.
I know we agree on the majority of the conspiracies, but on some we disagree...
If we make a DISCUSSION posts about a certain topic and we actually manage to finalize it, then we can just copy the link to any new user that has any questions about this topic. I see this as a win for everyone of us. Otherwise, we just share known materials to veterans, who can help with a lot of information.
-
How can we activate the veterans in conspiracy research to be more active and share their information with newcomers?
-
How can we have a useful debate that actually reaches a useful and truthful conclusion?
-
How can we make this community more proactive than it already is?
We should unite our efforts to make a difference, otherwise it's every man for himself... And how has that worked in the past?
It's clear that the enemy wants to divide us, so it might be a good idea to unite in the ideas that we agree on. It seems like a good idea to at least try. I can definitely say that it worked when Axeotl_Peotl was making the pools in the past about the most important conspiracy of the week.
Rules:
-
Attack the argument, not the person.
-
Add more information to the topic, if you can.
-
Expose shills, who have no rational reason to go against any topic.
If you see a positive use for this, please share any topics that you think are relevant. A Charlie Kirk discussion, or a united thread would be very useful, but of course any suggestions would be appreciated, just say what comes to your mind as an important conspiracy topic.
We had already great discussions in here on the Lahaina fires and other topics, where users were compiling big posts that clearly showed the conclusion of a combined research (sorry, if I miss your specific example, I just forget things).
That would be an extremely useful database. If we can compile all the information in one post, someone can share it, someone can make a documentary about it, someone can research for more details...
We all have different qualities that can be useful to expose the truth to others. It is better to share them then just use them on our own. What has been achieved so far by a single individual? But if we combine our resources, we might have a real chance to wake a lot of people with extensive research and firm message that would help them conclude that the mass media is lying.
I'm sorry that I have to be the person to restart this topic, but I haven't seen anything similar in some time in here. (I don't review this forum daily, so if you've done that and I've missed it - I'm sorry). But if we decide on a day that is specifically for these discussions, we might have a real breakthrough using the brains of this community.
If you think that's a good idea - comment your best conspiracy topic.
If you think that I shouldn't start this - make a DISCUSSION post about your best conspiracy topic.
Either way, I hope you can share knowledge between yourselves in a united manner. That would certainly show the greatest result, imo.
I'm not here to provide reasons to vote for me.
I only offer to the community myself, as I do to the whole world.
I offered to hear what I did wrong and how I could make it right.
What did you do right?
Answer that first, it's more important.
At this point I see nothing I can do right in your eyes, including adding 52 and 60 to get over 100.
I wouldn't count "Society of Jesus"; but in the comment just below we have the idea that "Jesus hasn't uprooted" candlesticks. In the post where my 52 didn't add to my 60. Your questions are now boring me so I won't give more examples.
I have no problem with anyone sharing my works or with being honest or with sharing them myself. I reserve the right to contextualize the mistakes of others.
I offered you peace, the offer stands indefinitely, if you don't want it you don't want it.
Add: I'm glad I gave this comment in the same cascade as my first response to your public request for topics (the only one you recieved), the same cascade where I admitted being called a "Christiantard". Because it shows the full range of your personality in your interactions with me, very convenient. Anyway, it was a great idea to start with and it was encouraging to review the range. We math students do have a range to our personalities, people forget. Add: Being asked for 100 Jewish and 100 Muslim denominations on a dare, providing them all immediately, and then being told I didn't provide them, that is a local maximum of fascinating experiences here, one which I'm likely to share again. Add: While I'm at it, I may as well contextualize how to spell u/axolotl_peyotl. Those are two great words in most dictionaries that go great together but don't usually make the SATs.
Moderation material right there... /s
Again with playing the victim... So overplayed...
I asked you questions -> you can't answer them. Then you can't accept a defeat. That's your own fault, not mine.
Likewise, pal. You proved your worth with that comment, and I thank you for that!
You're not a mod material, however.
Please don't... I never saw you on the international competitions that I won. So... please... don't... My dear, "math student"...
You clearly didn't provide 100.
And YOU SAID THAT YOU CAN PROVIDE 100. That's YOUR DARE, not mine...
Your claim. Not mine.
I just challenged you on that... And the results:
You made the dare. >>>> You lost it.
Be a grown person and take the defeat.
You lied, thou hypocrite.
Did you provide them?
Nope.
How does it feel to lose against your own comments? Is it boring? Oh, well...
See you next time when I demolish you with your own comments again until you learn to tell the truth, or at least show some humility when you lose your own daring argument.
You shouldn't be a mod.
Every time when you lose an argument, and you'll lose them a lot, you'll just ban people who disagree with you...
That's why you downvoted me, because you couldn't take it when someone disproves you...
At c/Christianity we call this reading comprehension, fren. Look again. 82+57=139 Jewish denominations. 52+60=112 Muslim denominations, or 111 if "Quranism" is taken to refer to the same thing in both the graphic and the purely additive list.
Loss is an allegation not in evidence.
Incidentally, when I ban or downvote, I'm pretty good at being unemotional about it, with no relation to "not taking it" about a debate. If disproven, I take it. If I believe I'm not disproven, I patiently explain why (or sometimes let a time-waster believe he's won if my conscience before third parties is clear). The rare occasions I know I'm "not taking" a response is when a person invokes in me the emotion of despair for their growth via, usually, rampant nonsense. On c/Christianity we call it misattribution when someone attributes a state of mind to another, when states of mind are by definition only known to the one experiencing them.
So when I downvote, it's because I'm communicating (usually as part of a collective) what I believe the relative value of the comment; and when I ban, it's because I have an objective, publishable violation (usually in conjunction with a graduated scale of disciplines). Funny, you accused me of wanting to not ban a person whom I think hadn't violated, and now you accuse me of wanting to ban a person whom I think hasn't violated. (Disagreement is no violation, bans are on behavior and never content.)
I say that simply to answer your questions, to offer an explanation in hope of your rationality, and to speak to interested lurkers. God bless you, in Jesus's name.