A double print that's never been admitted or found?
All the books now says berenstain. All of them. Yet we have millions of people who swear it was berenstein including myself. No one thinks it could've been berenstan or berensteer but specifically BERENSTEIN.
If it was due to misremembering than there would be several examples of them. It's always the new version and the old one that all remember. That goes for all Mandela effects.
I don't know why you reply 2 times to a single comment, but I guess you got triggered or something...
If you can't prove it, then leave it in the theory section... Some people swear that they saw Santa Claus... Should we immediately believe them as well?
I would rather believe a mistake in the print, before I jump to "someone is messing up with time... And all they did was this children's book"... :D :D :D
U really should look up the definition of triggered cause it has no relation to accidentally sending a message twice...🤣 dumbass
As for all the other garbage u wrote...ask questions if u don't understand a topic instead of going to a false high moral ground and ignorant response.
A double print that's never been admitted or found?
All the books now says berenstain. All of them. Yet we have millions of people who swear it was berenstein including myself. No one thinks it could've been berenstan or berensteer but specifically BERENSTEIN.
If it was due to misremembering than there would be several examples of them. It's always the new version and the old one that all remember. That goes for all Mandela effects.
I don't know why you reply 2 times to a single comment, but I guess you got triggered or something...
If you can't prove it, then leave it in the theory section... Some people swear that they saw Santa Claus... Should we immediately believe them as well?
I would rather believe a mistake in the print, before I jump to "someone is messing up with time... And all they did was this children's book"... :D :D :D
See how stupid this sounds?
Not sure why u think I'm triggered by responding twice to a comment but anywho...
Of course it can't be proven just like almost everything in the conspiracy THEORY world...
I tried to explain to u it's much more than it being this particular example of Just a 'children's book" but I guess u missed the Bible part.
Don't care if others missed the change but some people have noticed and would love to understand how and why.
Because you responded twice... Duuhhh...
Normal people don't do that fyi.
Now you're just downplaying it. Of course a lot can be proven, but you want to sound coherent.
Swing... And it's a miss...
Because you never explained it. Explanation is providing details, not just referencing it, which is what you did...
Nope, you're just absurd and hilarious in your delusion. That's pretty much how a loser speaks.
But you can defend your false claims if you want to. Or you can pretend that you have claims as you're currently doing...
It matters little to me, honestly. :D
U really should look up the definition of triggered cause it has no relation to accidentally sending a message twice...🤣 dumbass
As for all the other garbage u wrote...ask questions if u don't understand a topic instead of going to a false high moral ground and ignorant response.
😁