Garry Kasparov (who is Jewish) is considered the greatest chess player of all time. Kasparov is an enemy of Putin and is classified as a terrorist by Russia.
Kasparov said the following at the beginning of this October: "For me, the conflict in Gaza is the biggest distraction from global challenges. Europe is not decided in Gaza. It is decided in Ukraine. The outcome of everything, from Taiwan to Venezuela, will be decided in Ukraine." He also said: "I am convinced that the next step in escalation will be a small-scale provocation against a Baltic country before the end of the year. He will do it. He just needs to show that Article 5 does not work. His goal is to prove that NATO is dead, and the best way is to display its impotence. He will try it with a limited incursion."
I'm also very convinced that Russia will soon invade the Baltics. I published a post about it and summarized all the reasons I've heard that point to an impending Russian attack on the Baltics. I don't know if that will happen this year, but I'm certain it will happen by May 2026 at the latest.
You've clearly done a lot of close research on this and gone farther than all but a few have, but in my estimation you've gotten off the track--at least the track that I've found.
Gilgamesh and Nimrod are not one and the same. In fact, Nimrod is nearly universally misidentified, although the correct identification can be found in standard sources. Because it's correct, it's one of those things no one ever talks about. That's typical of how big secrets are kept.
To shoot down the "son of Cush" thing so many rely on to tie him to Noah, go back to the original Hebrew text. Gen 10:7-8 says:
Supposed scholars and researchers play fast and loose with the terminology. The two uses of "sons" in verse 7 are from ben, typically meaning male child but even more general than that:
The "father of" in verse 8 is even farther off from male child, coming from yalad:
The crucial note is that in consecutive sentences, one word was used twice then a different word was selected. The straightforward observation that no one makes is that the writer was describing two different relationships.
In the first, given that a list of proper names follows, sure, these are almost certainly lists of children. In the second, both word choice and construction are different.
Put that together with the knowledge that "Kush" also referred to what is now the area of southern Egypt, and the interpretation of the statement then becomes clear: Nimrod came from southern Egypt.
So can we identify Nimrod with anyone else? Yes.
The cuneiform representation of the name of a certain Babylonian/Sumerian "god" can be read in a certain way to produce AMAR.UTU. That gets corrupted to the version you find him called today: Marduk.
However, reading that very same cuneiform under a different set of rules for interpretation will also yield NAMR.UD. Certain scholars long before me held that this was the original source of the name we have today: Nimrod.
If you don't agree with just this much--which is your right--then our paths of research must diverge. There is a helluva lot more where this came from.
It’s not that I agree or disagree with anything you say, I’m always looking to learn more. And constantly challenge what I know and I take to be true. It’s one of the attributes of being a critical thinker, and I believe I am one, I’m willing to accept being wrong if it leads to the right answer. I have changed my opinion many times about many things. Obviously you have done plenty of research, so I pay attention. At the end of the day I go with my gut anyway.
I’m not 100% sure they are the same, but I don’t think it matters that much. What is more interesting to me is the ideas both (if they’re different) had. One wanted to be immortal. The other wanted to build something incredible. Note what God said “now nothing which they purpose to do will be impossible for them.” - Gen. 11:6 God didn’t say “total waste of their time”, but something completely different. That means Nimrod had the technology to build. He was probably the first Freemason. And probably the first of the post-flood antichrists. From where did Nimrod get the technology? Who gave it to him?
And another thought, do we have scarry technology today? Scarry enough that God is about to intervene? Again.
This makes sense. There is a common element to both Nimrod and Marduk in all his manifestations and that is the symbol of the snake, or serpent, or dragon. Nimrod appropriated the dragon and the snake as his personal emblems.
I’m interested as long as it connects to where we are today. What’s happening now in our World. Things didn’t really, totally, make sense to me until I came to the conclusion there are hybrids among us. Evil spreads no doubt about that, but it has to have an originating source. Everything else in the Universe does. Maybe evil comes from another dimension, but beings from this different dimension can’t control and dominate us humans, unless they figured out a way to infiltrate us. And hybrids, some still call them Nephilim, I don’t really care what you call them, are the enemies of humanity. Just like the war today is not a war between nations (kinetic war), an information war, a biological war, and all this is true … but a single war, the war against Humanity. You can call them Globalists, Zionists, Deep State, Freemasons, Communists, Illuminati, etc. I prefer to call them The Criminal Cabal with all leaders consisting of hybrids (not fully human). Maybe today they don’t have elongated skulls any longer like Egyptian Pharaoh Akhenaten, but my guess, if you were to do an analysis of their DNA you would find something very suspect.
As far as to how this all connects to what's happening today, yes, I had to make those connections to make sure it all worked out given all the available evidence. Further, I took a rigorous approach to it all, rejecting notions such as "evil" as being ill-defined. All is within the realm of common understandings and reasoning.
What I found out with this straightforward approach ended up smashing the foundations of... well, a lot of things. It disagrees fundamentally and profoundly with pretty much everything almost anyone has to say about it. But since it was all put together from plain bits of information such as you have now seen, I couldn't go back and suddenly declare it to be different, nor to "compromise" with any other researcher. The evidence is the evidence, not a mere convenience to my conclusions.
Of course, if it wasn't already obvious, I had to throw out almost everything I thought I knew about the world, my place in it, and just what the hell was going on. I had to accept how ignorant I had been, and how ignorant and intransigent everyone else was. All that is extremely uncomfortable and is a big part of why no one does it.
So if you think you have the answers--and I think you think you do--then just forget about everything I've said. It will only make you uncomfortable, then anxious, then angry. I've seen exactly that more times than I wish to recall. You don't get to be the hero of the story, you only get to be what people consider the lying dumbass and--if it goes far enough--the villain.
No, I don’t have the answers but I have a lot of questions instead. And I want to know, that's why acquiring knowledge is the first thing I do in the morning and the last thing before going to bed. That’s why shortly after Sep 2001 I decided no more TV for me, no more Hollywood, no MSM for me anywhere. I don’t trust Alt-Media either. I don’t want to be influenced by anyone, especially a jew in my living room, as the saying goes, via the TV set. And no mobile phones, I only use them is case of emergency and for time being for communication with a couple of people. I believe, at least for time being, SMS text messaging is a safer way of communication. Otherwise they go in a faraday cage. I guess you could say I’m paranoid. That’s fine with me, you could be right. However, the result, it completely changed the way I look a things. I would encourage everyone to try and duplicate this. I don’t think there would be too many takers, but c'est la vie.
I did the same thing. But I went a step further, I left anything I knew and I was comfortable with and moved thousands of kilometers from where my home was. Some people never understood my actions and still hate me for it, but then again c'est la vie.