I wonder if Kasparov has noticed Europe setting itself alight and cutting its own throat over the past few years? If so, do he rank that above or below what Russian has done to them?
You're correct in saying this, although it's not how I would state it. There is a roadmap for Europe's destruction, it's called the Kalergi Plan
The plan for Europe's destruction is nothing new, in fact it's 100 years old. And as Laura Aboli puts it "We are watching a careful plan executed step by step.". Gary Kasparov is either the dumbest person on Earth, or complicit. And I don't think he's dumb, maybe not smart, but definitely not dumb.
Well, to find the truth we often must look at the most subtle details which, upon examination, become greatly magnified.
The subtle but obvious question here is, "Precisely why is anyone interested in ruling over the ashes of Europe?" Pick whoever you like as the bad guys: globalists, Zionists, Eurocrats, the American Deep State, doesn't matter. Exactly what benefit do they seek in turning Europe into the northern counterpart to Africa or--at this rate--a nuclear wasteland with craters for capitals?
There is no sensible reason. Well, anyone who cares to will wave their hands around and claim that their selected boogeymen are just crazy like that. Such an explanation is less satisfying than any I choose to incorporate into my understanding of the world.
You see, whether it's Kalergi or Herzl or any of these other maniacs, everyone stops with the vague, subconscious notion that these people just woke up one morning full of this insanity for no reason whatsoever, including no personal benefit. Why would they think it was a good idea? Why would they think anyone was going to go along with it, instead of arresting them or locking them in a loony bin?
The reason I'm saying this is that I've been planning a post on just exactly where Zionism came from, but I've never gotten around to writing it up because everyone is already satisfied with the answers that their subconscious notion of the origins led them to.
And as for Kasparov, you can see how far away that genius is from any of these thoughts. I can guarantee you that he's satisfied with the answers he's found, though.
Precisely why is anyone interested in ruling over the ashes of Europe?
I think I have an answer to that question, anyway my opinion. And IMO, the plan is older than 100 years, it's about 2,500 years old. But, before I share that and start talking about interdimensional beings (non-human entities) I'd like to know if you are you familiar with Genesis 3:15 and Genesis 6:1–4? how about books that have been removed from the Bible, like The Book of Enoch (1 Enoch)?
Exactly what benefit do they seek in turning Europe into the northern counterpart to Africa
IMO, they're not driven by a tangible benefit like money or gold. It's something else and Europe is the key to it. I don't consider myself a religious person, but I know they are. Globalists, Zionists, Eurocrats, the American Deep State ... they all have one thing in common, they are students of Kabbalah. And they all follow it to some degree.
The "grand plan", as I've put it together, involves and includes a vast array of disparate areas of study, everything from ancient Sumerian texts to the Axial Age to the origin of modern cereal crops to the Vatican's "Lucifer" telescope to the irrational war against Russia to the murder of Charlie Kirk to the true nature of human consciousness and on and on.
That's a lot of wild shit to try to cram together into a single sensible puzzle, but I had to put together the fundamental pieces of that puzzle to make sure I had the puzzle correct at least in basic structure. I needed that to know how to carefully analyze and interpret evidence in that framework. At least to me, much previously baffling information suddenly fell into place and made sense.
In none of that effort, though, did I feel it necessary to resort to any assumption outside the currently accepted laws of the operation of the physical universe. Not that I think there aren't any undiscovered laws, I just never needed to deal myself any "wild cards" to give a sensible accounting of any evidence.
If we begin to talk about interdimensional entities, since there are no known characteristics of them, there are no known limitations to their actions and we can say nothing whatsoever about their motivations, any more than termites know exactly what humans are up to.
Something similar goes for Kabbalah and every other field of "occult" knowledge. On the one hand, none of it whatsoever has ever come up in my research as something I was required to know in order to give any explanation for situations or events. Never happened, never close, not once.
Frankly, all the information I've ever found to be useful--which was laying around in plain sight if you knew what you were looking for and what you were looking at--is nothing that anyone ever talks about. Well, that truly is the "occult", beyond all that is written in dusty books, is it not?
The mere fact that discussion of Kabbalah and Freemasonry and Gnosticism and Simulation Theory and all such topics come from people that are just saying, "Oooh, look at this!" is enough to tell me that's not where any real answers will be found.
To push it to the extreme, when you can't find anyone else in the whole wide world over the course of centuries who is talking about what you're talking about, well, you just might be on to something. Or nuts or way off the mark, because it will happen in those cases also.
I wonder if Kasparov has noticed Europe setting itself alight and cutting its own throat over the past few years? If so, do he rank that above or below what Russian has done to them?
You're correct in saying this, although it's not how I would state it. There is a roadmap for Europe's destruction, it's called the Kalergi Plan
The plan for Europe's destruction is nothing new, in fact it's 100 years old. And as Laura Aboli puts it "We are watching a careful plan executed step by step.". Gary Kasparov is either the dumbest person on Earth, or complicit. And I don't think he's dumb, maybe not smart, but definitely not dumb.
Well, to find the truth we often must look at the most subtle details which, upon examination, become greatly magnified.
The subtle but obvious question here is, "Precisely why is anyone interested in ruling over the ashes of Europe?" Pick whoever you like as the bad guys: globalists, Zionists, Eurocrats, the American Deep State, doesn't matter. Exactly what benefit do they seek in turning Europe into the northern counterpart to Africa or--at this rate--a nuclear wasteland with craters for capitals?
There is no sensible reason. Well, anyone who cares to will wave their hands around and claim that their selected boogeymen are just crazy like that. Such an explanation is less satisfying than any I choose to incorporate into my understanding of the world.
You see, whether it's Kalergi or Herzl or any of these other maniacs, everyone stops with the vague, subconscious notion that these people just woke up one morning full of this insanity for no reason whatsoever, including no personal benefit. Why would they think it was a good idea? Why would they think anyone was going to go along with it, instead of arresting them or locking them in a loony bin?
The reason I'm saying this is that I've been planning a post on just exactly where Zionism came from, but I've never gotten around to writing it up because everyone is already satisfied with the answers that their subconscious notion of the origins led them to.
And as for Kasparov, you can see how far away that genius is from any of these thoughts. I can guarantee you that he's satisfied with the answers he's found, though.
I think I have an answer to that question, anyway my opinion. And IMO, the plan is older than 100 years, it's about 2,500 years old. But, before I share that and start talking about interdimensional beings (non-human entities) I'd like to know if you are you familiar with Genesis 3:15 and Genesis 6:1–4? how about books that have been removed from the Bible, like The Book of Enoch (1 Enoch)?
IMO, they're not driven by a tangible benefit like money or gold. It's something else and Europe is the key to it. I don't consider myself a religious person, but I know they are. Globalists, Zionists, Eurocrats, the American Deep State ... they all have one thing in common, they are students of Kabbalah. And they all follow it to some degree.
The "grand plan", as I've put it together, involves and includes a vast array of disparate areas of study, everything from ancient Sumerian texts to the Axial Age to the origin of modern cereal crops to the Vatican's "Lucifer" telescope to the irrational war against Russia to the murder of Charlie Kirk to the true nature of human consciousness and on and on.
That's a lot of wild shit to try to cram together into a single sensible puzzle, but I had to put together the fundamental pieces of that puzzle to make sure I had the puzzle correct at least in basic structure. I needed that to know how to carefully analyze and interpret evidence in that framework. At least to me, much previously baffling information suddenly fell into place and made sense.
In none of that effort, though, did I feel it necessary to resort to any assumption outside the currently accepted laws of the operation of the physical universe. Not that I think there aren't any undiscovered laws, I just never needed to deal myself any "wild cards" to give a sensible accounting of any evidence.
If we begin to talk about interdimensional entities, since there are no known characteristics of them, there are no known limitations to their actions and we can say nothing whatsoever about their motivations, any more than termites know exactly what humans are up to.
Something similar goes for Kabbalah and every other field of "occult" knowledge. On the one hand, none of it whatsoever has ever come up in my research as something I was required to know in order to give any explanation for situations or events. Never happened, never close, not once.
Frankly, all the information I've ever found to be useful--which was laying around in plain sight if you knew what you were looking for and what you were looking at--is nothing that anyone ever talks about. Well, that truly is the "occult", beyond all that is written in dusty books, is it not?
The mere fact that discussion of Kabbalah and Freemasonry and Gnosticism and Simulation Theory and all such topics come from people that are just saying, "Oooh, look at this!" is enough to tell me that's not where any real answers will be found.
To push it to the extreme, when you can't find anyone else in the whole wide world over the course of centuries who is talking about what you're talking about, well, you just might be on to something. Or nuts or way off the mark, because it will happen in those cases also.