I've long said, based on stuff just like this, that Theoretical Physics and Archaeology are two of the most corrupt "industries" out there. You won't even get peer reviewed if you don't toe the narrative line, and you won't get funding either.
Ayh have spent 15 years advocating for review of particle theory for its algebraic necessity to embrace absolute nothingness as a dominate characteristic in nature -- and just even positing instability of particle theory is a "how dare you" to the conditioned brainwashed generations of students and professors whose indoctrination they wear on their sleeves like badges of honor. Ayh agree that it has become so corrupted in the last 120 years to profiteer from celebrity and tenure and publication. Einstein (who ayh disagree a lot with) became the benchmark of aspiration for theoretical physicists going forward, focusing more on the consumable theatrics than practical mechanical understanding.
For relativity aka for conditioning and brainwashing those who nature set apart from one another, into artificially relating to one another within a scientific consensus.
Meanwhile...Einstein aka EIN (one) ST (saint/sancire/to separate) EIN (one) aka the separation of oneness (whole) into each one (partial) within.
Ayh have spent 15 years advocating for review of particle theory...
It's as cheap as using free will of choice to discern oneself as particle within all of nature. No theory; just praxis aka practicing free will of choice by resisting the temptation to bind self to another.
Ayh agree
If a particle agrees, then it relates to other particles, which inverts the particular nature into artificial commonality.
A jew utilizes suggestion to tempt gentiles to agree or disagree, thereby establishing a relation among both sides within a conflict called reason (agree vs disagree).
As in..."The theory of relativity, developed by Albert Einstein, includes two main parts"...suggestion and consent aka special relativity (ones consent to the suggested) and general relativity (consensus formed by each ones consent).
I never woulda guessed physics is gatekept, that's nuts
I've heard dinosaurs are BS (if it's featured in a spielberg film, that's a good hint), but I wondered how the archeology was run all around. The bone wars rise of dinosaur stuff is a good taste of how corrupt the dinosaur stuff can get
"I've heard dinosaurs are BS (if it's featured in a spielberg film, that's a good hint)"
SpielBERG is a illusionist. What makes you think I would listen to him regarding any scientific statement. He's still squirming from the death of Carol Ann. Also, reference what you are talking about. What 'movie' does he say this?
What I mean is Jurassic Park is about dinosaurs, any topic spielberg bothers to a film for is probably some kind of propaganda lie, like schindlers' list
All spielberg did was have a script written off of the original book by Michael Crichton and turned it into a movie. Yes, some of the DNA stuff was intriguing for the plot line, but nothing like that could ever be done in the real world, due to dinosaur/reptilian life being so far in the past. DNA at that point would have LONG decomposed/been fossilized and none of it would be extrable.
I'm responding to you under the assumption that you are in a conspiracy forum, and I'm assuming you think that dinosaurs are being genetically breed in today's world, because 'hollywood made a movie about it', and it's 'predicitive programming'.
No I'm not speaking on specifics of DNA breeding from the film, just that Spielberg was generally advertising concept of "dinosaurs" by showing these big images, that was the propaganda, the specifics in film aren't important.
Foundation implies that which separates one from one another...ones consent to suggested funding from one another tempts one to ignore that.
Funding from another distracts from being within foundation.
narrative line
There's only one line (inception towards death) for each one (life) within...it isn't narrating; but moving sound through those who choose to shape noisy narratives to distract each other from the sound of silence.
peer review
Review aka re (to respond) view/weid (to see) implies each ones different perspective (perception) within all (perceivable)...ones consent to any suggestion by another establishes a consensus aka an artificial equal (peer) among natural differences (review).
Suggested physicism by another tempts one to ignore self discernment as being within all of nature. Perception implies natural; suggestion implies artificial...a suggestion by another requires ones consent to ignore all perceivable.
I posted here about how British bankster money funded the Solvay Lectures and got everyone in the same box, with the exception of Einstein. Now people believe in "quantum physics" that is about denial of a quantum, their certainty in the "uncertainty principle", and the simplicity of the sum of infinite possibilities.
The goal is to keep everything in lockstep and to shut out the millennia of science that was based on learning the laws of God. I learned that John Draper declared war on religion in the 19th century on behalf of the new Darwinian-Huxleyan "science" and the establishment has continued ever since.
Summation represses possibility. Possible aka posse (being able) implies each enabled being, separated from one another, during a whole process.
Procession (inception towards death) separates potential (life).
It's a jew who suggests the sum of all things aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka mosaic law (puzzling parts together into a whole) aka united states; united nations; united kingdom; european union; soviet union aka uniformity; university; unicode; unicef; universal pictures; universal basic income aka "There comes a time when we heed a certain call; when the world must come together as one"... https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/michaeljackson/weretheworldusaforafrica.html
I've long said, based on stuff just like this, that Theoretical Physics and Archaeology are two of the most corrupt "industries" out there. You won't even get peer reviewed if you don't toe the narrative line, and you won't get funding either.
Ayh have spent 15 years advocating for review of particle theory for its algebraic necessity to embrace absolute nothingness as a dominate characteristic in nature -- and just even positing instability of particle theory is a "how dare you" to the conditioned brainwashed generations of students and professors whose indoctrination they wear on their sleeves like badges of honor. Ayh agree that it has become so corrupted in the last 120 years to profiteer from celebrity and tenure and publication. Einstein (who ayh disagree a lot with) became the benchmark of aspiration for theoretical physicists going forward, focusing more on the consumable theatrics than practical mechanical understanding.
For relativity aka for conditioning and brainwashing those who nature set apart from one another, into artificially relating to one another within a scientific consensus.
Meanwhile...Einstein aka EIN (one) ST (saint/sancire/to separate) EIN (one) aka the separation of oneness (whole) into each one (partial) within.
It's as cheap as using free will of choice to discern oneself as particle within all of nature. No theory; just praxis aka practicing free will of choice by resisting the temptation to bind self to another.
If a particle agrees, then it relates to other particles, which inverts the particular nature into artificial commonality.
A jew utilizes suggestion to tempt gentiles to agree or disagree, thereby establishing a relation among both sides within a conflict called reason (agree vs disagree).
As in..."The theory of relativity, developed by Albert Einstein, includes two main parts"...suggestion and consent aka special relativity (ones consent to the suggested) and general relativity (consensus formed by each ones consent).
I never woulda guessed physics is gatekept, that's nuts
I've heard dinosaurs are BS (if it's featured in a spielberg film, that's a good hint), but I wondered how the archeology was run all around. The bone wars rise of dinosaur stuff is a good taste of how corrupt the dinosaur stuff can get
"I've heard dinosaurs are BS (if it's featured in a spielberg film, that's a good hint)"
SpielBERG is a illusionist. What makes you think I would listen to him regarding any scientific statement. He's still squirming from the death of Carol Ann. Also, reference what you are talking about. What 'movie' does he say this?
What I mean is Jurassic Park is about dinosaurs, any topic spielberg bothers to a film for is probably some kind of propaganda lie, like schindlers' list
All spielberg did was have a script written off of the original book by Michael Crichton and turned it into a movie. Yes, some of the DNA stuff was intriguing for the plot line, but nothing like that could ever be done in the real world, due to dinosaur/reptilian life being so far in the past. DNA at that point would have LONG decomposed/been fossilized and none of it would be extrable.
I'm responding to you under the assumption that you are in a conspiracy forum, and I'm assuming you think that dinosaurs are being genetically breed in today's world, because 'hollywood made a movie about it', and it's 'predicitive programming'.
No I'm not speaking on specifics of DNA breeding from the film, just that Spielberg was generally advertising concept of "dinosaurs" by showing these big images, that was the propaganda, the specifics in film aren't important.
they devil the father of lies governs in the darkness. he corrupst everything because if the truth came to light, his lies would be exposed.
Foundation implies that which separates one from one another...ones consent to suggested funding from one another tempts one to ignore that.
Funding from another distracts from being within foundation.
There's only one line (inception towards death) for each one (life) within...it isn't narrating; but moving sound through those who choose to shape noisy narratives to distract each other from the sound of silence.
Review aka re (to respond) view/weid (to see) implies each ones different perspective (perception) within all (perceivable)...ones consent to any suggestion by another establishes a consensus aka an artificial equal (peer) among natural differences (review).
Suggested physicism by another tempts one to ignore self discernment as being within all of nature. Perception implies natural; suggestion implies artificial...a suggestion by another requires ones consent to ignore all perceivable.
This is about YEC.
See Expelled by Ben Stein.
I posted here about how British bankster money funded the Solvay Lectures and got everyone in the same box, with the exception of Einstein. Now people believe in "quantum physics" that is about denial of a quantum, their certainty in the "uncertainty principle", and the simplicity of the sum of infinite possibilities.
The goal is to keep everything in lockstep and to shut out the millennia of science that was based on learning the laws of God. I learned that John Draper declared war on religion in the 19th century on behalf of the new Darwinian-Huxleyan "science" and the establishment has continued ever since.
But God reveals his secrets to his prophets.
Summation represses possibility. Possible aka posse (being able) implies each enabled being, separated from one another, during a whole process.
Procession (inception towards death) separates potential (life).
It's a jew who suggests the sum of all things aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka mosaic law (puzzling parts together into a whole) aka united states; united nations; united kingdom; european union; soviet union aka uniformity; university; unicode; unicef; universal pictures; universal basic income aka "There comes a time when we heed a certain call; when the world must come together as one"... https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/michaeljackson/weretheworldusaforafrica.html