Even though you were coerced, you were not FORCED. You could take the poison shot for a donut, or to keep your shitty job, or for dopamine high by posting "i got vaxed" on your facebook or social media page so that bots could upvote you and feed your ego / vanity.
It was indeed a weaponization of temptation and I appreciate you putting it in that perspective.
I do consider it to be murder because murder was the intent all along.
What if I bait a trap to catch a rat? I put cheese in the trap. The rat must consent that by taking the cheese, the trap may catch him. Is it not my intent to murder the rat all along? Does the rat's consent to try to snatch cheese from mysterious object, perhaps with the scent of humans on it, pardon me from my intent to murder the rat all along?
Choice can only be wielded within balance...motion implies the force generating balance (inception towards death) for choice (life).
Coercion aims temptation at ones free will of choice, and temptation aka temporary within action implies the force of nature moving through each being.
You could take the poison shot for a donut
The donut represents a distraction; the poison shot represents the temptation to justify ones ignorance, and the fear of covid represents ones ignorance of the natural force.
Force moves from origin towards outcome...fear implies towards outcome, while ignoring origin. The "turning point" represents ones free will of choice. Notice also that fear can be held onto; while force can't. Even worse...one forces self to hold onto fear.
Btw a donut implies a circle around nothingness aka circular logic around suggested information. No matter with what logic is filled; one remains hungry for more suggested information aka "homer simpson in hell/heaven"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAvYNmvodGk
It was indeed a weaponization of temptation
But the weapon of choice each one wields freely...
I do consider it to be murder because murder was the intent all along.
Consider aka "siding together" is why one applies justice for crime upon another, while ignoring that each being within nature represents crime within justice.
As for intent aka purpose aka forwarded (inception towards death) position (life)...
Does a lion "intending" to eat a gazelle represents murder or is intention a misnomer of ones judgement?
A jew tempts gentiles with intention and consideration against one another.
What if I bait a trap to catch a rat?
Then you tempt the rat to go for the wanted, yet not needed, bait aka cheese.
The rat must consent that by taking the cheese
The cheese represents the "want vs not want" bait aka the suggestion tempting one to ignore perceivable "need" aka hunger.
the trap may catch him
Consenting to want or not want the suggested bait increases the odds of what may happen. And if both want and not want represent consent to the bait, then that evens the odds for the trap.
So why does "not want" represent consent to the bait? Because it ignores need for want/not want. If one rat chooses to not want; then other rats are being tempted to want. The trapper will notice rats fighting each other over the bait...not all of those rats are just greedy for the cheese, but aware of the danger as well.
Once again the Simpsons showed this by Lisa testing brother vs hamster with an electrocuted cake.
Is it not my intent to murder the rat all along?
Ones intent has no power over the consent of another. Only the force of nature has dominance over each beings free will of choice, hence free-dom.
Why use traps and bait to catch a rat if you've more power in the first place? This is about avoiding the temptations of one another, while nature separates both from one another.
Does the rat's consent...pardon me
The con (together) puts each one (rat + man) on par (equality in value or circumstances) with one another. That's the trick, that's why a jew utilizes tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) to tempt gentiles into a consensus with one another.
As for natural pardon...inception sentences life towards point of death. No pardons. Pardon aka "to forgive" represents the inversion of being (life) given forwards (inception towards death).
Good point.
Even though you were coerced, you were not FORCED. You could take the poison shot for a donut, or to keep your shitty job, or for dopamine high by posting "i got vaxed" on your facebook or social media page so that bots could upvote you and feed your ego / vanity.
It was indeed a weaponization of temptation and I appreciate you putting it in that perspective.
I do consider it to be murder because murder was the intent all along.
What if I bait a trap to catch a rat? I put cheese in the trap. The rat must consent that by taking the cheese, the trap may catch him. Is it not my intent to murder the rat all along? Does the rat's consent to try to snatch cheese from mysterious object, perhaps with the scent of humans on it, pardon me from my intent to murder the rat all along?
Choice can only be wielded within balance...motion implies the force generating balance (inception towards death) for choice (life).
Coercion aims temptation at ones free will of choice, and temptation aka temporary within action implies the force of nature moving through each being.
The donut represents a distraction; the poison shot represents the temptation to justify ones ignorance, and the fear of covid represents ones ignorance of the natural force.
Force moves from origin towards outcome...fear implies towards outcome, while ignoring origin. The "turning point" represents ones free will of choice. Notice also that fear can be held onto; while force can't. Even worse...one forces self to hold onto fear.
Btw a donut implies a circle around nothingness aka circular logic around suggested information. No matter with what logic is filled; one remains hungry for more suggested information aka "homer simpson in hell/heaven"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAvYNmvodGk
But the weapon of choice each one wields freely...
Consider aka "siding together" is why one applies justice for crime upon another, while ignoring that each being within nature represents crime within justice.
As for intent aka purpose aka forwarded (inception towards death) position (life)...
Does a lion "intending" to eat a gazelle represents murder or is intention a misnomer of ones judgement?
Look at this... https://www.etymonline.com/word/intention (intent = desire, and turning ones attention)
A jew tempts gentiles with intention and consideration against one another.
Then you tempt the rat to go for the wanted, yet not needed, bait aka cheese.
The cheese represents the "want vs not want" bait aka the suggestion tempting one to ignore perceivable "need" aka hunger.
Consenting to want or not want the suggested bait increases the odds of what may happen. And if both want and not want represent consent to the bait, then that evens the odds for the trap.
So why does "not want" represent consent to the bait? Because it ignores need for want/not want. If one rat chooses to not want; then other rats are being tempted to want. The trapper will notice rats fighting each other over the bait...not all of those rats are just greedy for the cheese, but aware of the danger as well.
Once again the Simpsons showed this by Lisa testing brother vs hamster with an electrocuted cake.
Ones intent has no power over the consent of another. Only the force of nature has dominance over each beings free will of choice, hence free-dom.
Why use traps and bait to catch a rat if you've more power in the first place? This is about avoiding the temptations of one another, while nature separates both from one another.
The con (together) puts each one (rat + man) on par (equality in value or circumstances) with one another. That's the trick, that's why a jew utilizes tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) to tempt gentiles into a consensus with one another.
As for natural pardon...inception sentences life towards point of death. No pardons. Pardon aka "to forgive" represents the inversion of being (life) given forwards (inception towards death).