Not a random person. THE secretary of defense who DID warn the public about "advanced flying vehicles from the polar regions".
The official story is he committed suicide. If you're stupid enough to believe that then you're stupid enough to believe kash patel about jeffrey epstein.
physically incapable of disproving
That's not true and I don't even have to. You don't prove a negative. That's not how logic works. YOU need to provide evidence in the affirmative that those tapes showed what you assert they do. which you can't because everyone here speaks English and understands that whatever evidence you think you had has been destroyed, if it ever existed in the first place.
Let's do a little thought experiment to help you understand this logical fallacy.
I'm going to assert that you're a faggot. So, either you provide physical evidence which proves you're not or I win.
Do you see how that just doesn't work? You're going to have to start asking some hard questions about space travel or admit you're gay and suck a dick, faggot.
Cool, neat; lying about a man’s death to promote your clinically insane jewish hoaxes. I bet you think we believe you’re white.
Thanks for admitting you are physically incapable of disproving the confirmed fact that the reels were taped over.
Not a random person. THE secretary of defense who DID warn the public about "advanced flying vehicles from the polar regions".
The official story is he committed suicide. If you're stupid enough to believe that then you're stupid enough to believe kash patel about jeffrey epstein.
That's not true and I don't even have to. You don't prove a negative. That's not how logic works. YOU need to provide evidence in the affirmative that those tapes showed what you assert they do. which you can't because everyone here speaks English and understands that whatever evidence you think you had has been destroyed, if it ever existed in the first place.
Thanks for asserting something no one questioned. You’re physically incapable of defending yourself in any capacity.
Claims dismissed off-hand, then. Bye, paid jewish shill.
Let's do a little thought experiment to help you understand this logical fallacy.
I'm going to assert that you're a faggot. So, either you provide physical evidence which proves you're not or I win.
Do you see how that just doesn't work? You're going to have to start asking some hard questions about space travel or admit you're gay and suck a dick, faggot.
Zero evidence; assertion ignored.
See how that works.