One can only twist what's already turned against one another, hence black vs white; offense vs defense; right vs wrong; humane vs inhumane; accept vs deny etc.
A jew utilizes suggestion to tempt gentiles to consent from both sides to a mutual conflict (reason) against each other, which only then permits a jew to further twist it aka to squeeze conflict for all it's worth, hence "war is a racket"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Is_a_Racket
Holding onto white or black implies materialism. Once held onto either; both sides establish a dia-lect.
In nature...material (life) cannot hold onto either side (inception towards death) of motion. There's no dialect/argument/conflict of reason in-between inception and death...only within the mind/memory of ignorant life.
That's the marxist twist.
One can only twist what's already turned against one another, hence black vs white; offense vs defense; right vs wrong; humane vs inhumane; accept vs deny etc.
A jew utilizes suggestion to tempt gentiles to consent from both sides to a mutual conflict (reason) against each other, which only then permits a jew to further twist it aka to squeeze conflict for all it's worth, hence "war is a racket"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Is_a_Racket
From a different angle: Holding onto one side; while fighting one holding onto the other side implies "dialectical materialism"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectical_materialism
Holding onto white or black implies materialism. Once held onto either; both sides establish a dia-lect.
In nature...material (life) cannot hold onto either side (inception towards death) of motion. There's no dialect/argument/conflict of reason in-between inception and death...only within the mind/memory of ignorant life.