I have been of the mind for many years that the president has little if anything to do with running the country. It's almost as if he's the "news presenter".
I believe a narrative shift will assist with slowing down progress. The vote is more a signal of what side gave up. I believe it doesn't matter who the president is, it's just an indication of how much the population will accept in a particular direction. Much of the deportations that Trump did early into his administration was established before he was elected or took office. I've been in conversations with friends over the past 6 or 7 years about how development has favored high density living arrangements. Getting people to consolidate into those areas would require several steps and deportation or immigrants is about middle of the list. I believe this plan was in place over 50 years ago and a massive labor force was needed to build enough, quickly enough to pull off the plan. Deportation (population reduction), financial depression, Universal Basic Income and AI would all play into it. I'll probably be dead and gone before the final stages are in place because I'm already in my 60's. The vote only tells them what areas of the plan they can accelerate and what areas to slow down to keep everyone in control. About 10 - 12 years ago I said that the next massive war will happen in Africa and I'm sticking to that vision. Give it about 5 more years and you'll see. They have a guilty conscience and that is why they are bringing a large number of people to Europe from Africa. I believe China has been given dominion over Africa.
I see, I've also seen it as a tool for measurement, but a lagging indicator as I believe they already know who they want to be in power and that the voting numbers we see are probably fake anyway (Trump supporters believe this but somehow ONLY for 2020)
I have been of the mind for many years that the president has little if anything to do with running the country. It's almost as if he's the "news presenter".
But doesn't that seem incongruous with your previous assertion that the alternative was worse?
I believe a narrative shift will assist with slowing down progress. The vote is more a signal of what side gave up. I believe it doesn't matter who the president is, it's just an indication of how much the population will accept in a particular direction. Much of the deportations that Trump did early into his administration was established before he was elected or took office. I've been in conversations with friends over the past 6 or 7 years about how development has favored high density living arrangements. Getting people to consolidate into those areas would require several steps and deportation or immigrants is about middle of the list. I believe this plan was in place over 50 years ago and a massive labor force was needed to build enough, quickly enough to pull off the plan. Deportation (population reduction), financial depression, Universal Basic Income and AI would all play into it. I'll probably be dead and gone before the final stages are in place because I'm already in my 60's. The vote only tells them what areas of the plan they can accelerate and what areas to slow down to keep everyone in control. About 10 - 12 years ago I said that the next massive war will happen in Africa and I'm sticking to that vision. Give it about 5 more years and you'll see. They have a guilty conscience and that is why they are bringing a large number of people to Europe from Africa. I believe China has been given dominion over Africa.
I see, I've also seen it as a tool for measurement, but a lagging indicator as I believe they already know who they want to be in power and that the voting numbers we see are probably fake anyway (Trump supporters believe this but somehow ONLY for 2020)