Religion aka re (to respond) ligo (to bind)...asking a question binds one to answers. Nature implies solution (inception towards death) setting problems free (life)...no questions or answers required to come in; sustain, and go out of being.
Who created all
a) ALL wasn't created, because a creator would contradict ALL by implying more than ALL.
b) All transforms into each one by internal division/separation/analysis etc.
c) All was before anyone within can suggest to one another that all was created.
Creation doesn't analyze whole...it tricks partials to synthesize consent and suggestion into an artifical whole (egregore; system; arrangement; organized whole; belief etc.)
Consenting to any suggestion implies religion.
by a group of followers from ground up.
Being implies apart (seed) from ground (soil)...grouping together prevents each part from growing.
A jew suggests gentiles to group together, which establishes conflict aka "survival of the fittest" aka "battle royale" aka "society" aka "civilization" aka a coliseum where two sides collide against one another... https://www.etymonline.com/word/amphitheater
b) What if start (inception) and goal (death) of being (life) aren't the start and goal of nature?
complete
Being within nature implies an internal separation of whole into partial..."complete" represents the inversion of that; suggested by others as tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together), hence com (together) plete/plere (to fill).
oblivion
Filling ones memory with suggested information makes one oblivious to perceivable inspiration moving through one.
The more ones memory holds onto; the less awareness one has.
civilization and its descent into becoming livestock
Nature privatizes being...beings civilize each other into public livestock. Civilization implies domestication, hence the descent of FREE will of choice to DOM-inance by a chosen one.
Public descent or private rise...it's ones free will of choice.
jew; muslim; christian
a) Different sides (muslim; christian) within same origin (jew)...whatever side one chooses tempts one to fight the other, while ignoring origin.
b) Notice that a muslim and a christian choose to join; while a jew was selected to be aka if many join together, then few remain apart.
c) A jew doesn't choose a side...a jew protects SIGHT by tempting gentiles to choose a SIDE. Sides put blinders over sight, while permitting an outside overseer.
Where’s hinduism? It has just as much in common with these three as they do with each other. Don’t give me that “Abrahamic” shit. They’re diametric opposites.
India is the only pagan culture (out of the farther east like China or Japan where they cannot alter their moral code through outright Abrahamic faith at all) the Jews spared because they took an interest in it when they colonized it.
The Red Heifer has been sacrificed, and the Third Temple will be built upon real ID Internet and its purification of all idols and adultery as according to Abrahamic faith.
The Internet as you know it will be gone and be replaced by a beast resembling cable television, and you have nowhere to go, nowhere to hide.
You cannot hide from the Internet like you cannot hide from the Medieval Darkness that once struck Europe.
The Red Heifer has been sacrificed, and the Third Temple will be built
There is no need for a 3rd temple, our body is the temple. "Do you not know that your bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit" - 1 Corinthians 6:19
They state “Since there is no longer a Temple in Jerusalem, the rituals of the red heifer—as well as most of the laws surrounding ritual purity—will be applicable only in the messianic era” – Chabad Lubavitch
Whatever happened to Europe in the Medieval Dark Ages and Russia, Germany, China and Cambodia in the 20th century is what will happen to the entire world around a decade later.
You can push them back so definitely that they cannot come back, but you cannot choose to not participate.
Failing to follow the Noahide Laws in the Second Millennium Kingdom means death.
Religion aka re (to respond) ligo (to bind)...asking a question binds one to answers. Nature implies solution (inception towards death) setting problems free (life)...no questions or answers required to come in; sustain, and go out of being.
a) ALL wasn't created, because a creator would contradict ALL by implying more than ALL.
b) All transforms into each one by internal division/separation/analysis etc.
c) All was before anyone within can suggest to one another that all was created.
Creation doesn't analyze whole...it tricks partials to synthesize consent and suggestion into an artifical whole (egregore; system; arrangement; organized whole; belief etc.)
Consenting to any suggestion implies religion.
Being implies apart (seed) from ground (soil)...grouping together prevents each part from growing.
A jew suggests gentiles to group together, which establishes conflict aka "survival of the fittest" aka "battle royale" aka "society" aka "civilization" aka a coliseum where two sides collide against one another... https://www.etymonline.com/word/amphitheater
There can be only one's sight...any suggested side tempts one to ignore that.
Does nature show sides or does it give each being sight in-between left/right + front/back + up/down position?
Can one's sight (life) perceive ones sides (inception/death)?
Beast aka "being astute" implies each beings different discernment within the same nature.
What's the nature of BE (ing) AST (ute)? https://crossidiomas.com/nature-of-the-beast/
a) How could only one have three sides?
b) What if start (inception) and goal (death) of being (life) aren't the start and goal of nature?
Being within nature implies an internal separation of whole into partial..."complete" represents the inversion of that; suggested by others as tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together), hence com (together) plete/plere (to fill).
Filling ones memory with suggested information makes one oblivious to perceivable inspiration moving through one.
The more ones memory holds onto; the less awareness one has.
Nature privatizes being...beings civilize each other into public livestock. Civilization implies domestication, hence the descent of FREE will of choice to DOM-inance by a chosen one.
Public descent or private rise...it's ones free will of choice.
a) Different sides (muslim; christian) within same origin (jew)...whatever side one chooses tempts one to fight the other, while ignoring origin.
b) Notice that a muslim and a christian choose to join; while a jew was selected to be aka if many join together, then few remain apart.
c) A jew doesn't choose a side...a jew protects SIGHT by tempting gentiles to choose a SIDE. Sides put blinders over sight, while permitting an outside overseer.
Sephardic aka se-phar aka "seeing far"...a narrow mind cannot discern this.
Where’s hinduism? It has just as much in common with these three as they do with each other. Don’t give me that “Abrahamic” shit. They’re diametric opposites.
India is the only pagan culture (out of the farther east like China or Japan where they cannot alter their moral code through outright Abrahamic faith at all) the Jews spared because they took an interest in it when they colonized it.
The Red Heifer has been sacrificed, and the Third Temple will be built upon real ID Internet and its purification of all idols and adultery as according to Abrahamic faith.
The Internet as you know it will be gone and be replaced by a beast resembling cable television, and you have nowhere to go, nowhere to hide.
You cannot hide from the Internet like you cannot hide from the Medieval Darkness that once struck Europe.
There is no need for a 3rd temple, our body is the temple. "Do you not know that your bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit" - 1 Corinthians 6:19
They state “Since there is no longer a Temple in Jerusalem, the rituals of the red heifer—as well as most of the laws surrounding ritual purity—will be applicable only in the messianic era” – Chabad Lubavitch
You can choose to not participate.
You cannot.
Whatever happened to Europe in the Medieval Dark Ages and Russia, Germany, China and Cambodia in the 20th century is what will happen to the entire world around a decade later.
You can push them back so definitely that they cannot come back, but you cannot choose to not participate.
Failing to follow the Noahide Laws in the Second Millennium Kingdom means death.
So be it. I have made my choice.
a) Not implies ones choice to consent to suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) aka ones de-nial of perceivable for suggested.
Not denies everything (whole) giving each thing (partial) a free will of choice to respond.
b) Choosing to join the choices suggested by another inverts participation...joining together contradicts being apart from one another.
Joining any religion sacrifices natural particularity for artificial commonality.
YOU originates from ones choice to take possession of self as "me; myself or I", which shapes everyone else into a YOU (phonetic you).
The origin of YOU (jew) implies I AM (je suis; jesus)...
YOU sacrifices ones choice to a chosen one.