General consensus is that normies are naive, brainwashed, believe everything the news tells them etc, etc... But is that really so? Maybe they are not as dumb as we think they are? Maybe most of them know it's a lie, they just choose to go along with the narrative?
Sure, there always will be some who are genuinely duped, but I'm not sure it's the majority. Like, when covid was going on, I met a lot of normies who publicly went along with the narrative, but privately it was obvious that they are not afraid of the scary virus at all. They didn't admit it out loud (even privately), but their actions were telling that (at least on some level) they know it's bullshit.
I find this thought a quite dark and depressing one. That would mean most of the people are happy to accept a lie and live with it just because it offers them some sort of benefit or simply because it's easier that way. Maybe this is why getting the truth out is not as effective as we'd like it to be. Also, that would mean mass awakening is probably not forthcoming, because there's nothing to awake from. Normies for the most part are already awake. They just don't care.
Actual moves and cannot be held onto...to believe implies holding onto fictional, while ignoring actual.
Nothing cannot be sensed...suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) tempts ones senses to deny everything perceivable.
a) Few suggest norms aka "standard, patterns, or models" to tempt many to restrict "free" will of choice by consenting to norms.
b) Norm; from Greek gnōmōn - "carpenter's square"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/norm
Freemasonry utilizes suggested norms as square and resulting circular logic as compass to manipulate the free will of choice among others.
Reality doesn't generate consensus...it separates choice from one another. Others suggest fiction to tempt ones choice to give consent, which permits few to amass many into consensus aka hivemind.
To know implies each ones perception within all perceivable...true vs lie reasoning implies ones consent to a suggestion, while ignoring perceivable.
Nature doesn't generate truth or lies...only change.
a) Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) needs to resist the wanted temptation to follow along...others influence by information to tempt following.
b) Nature doesn't narrate...it moves sound, which internally separates instruments from one another. Narration implies the articulation of natural sound.
Being within nature implies as one (partial) within oneness (whole)...others suggest collectivization, which when consented to, establishes a minority vs majority conflict of reason.
"I'm just following orders" ~anyone consenting to the suggestion of another. Admission vs denial reasoning represents the artificial distraction thereof.
As for loud...nature implies the sound of silence; beings articulating words to one another implies noise. If one resists the noise, then one can sense the silence. That's the tranquillity; serenity; equanimity etc. only oneself can find.
Nature acts, which allows being to re-act aka respond to being enacted upon.
Few suggest actors under directors within movies to distract many from action directing (inception towards death) reaction (life) through motion.
One cannot act...only react, hence being given a choice how to react.
Discernment implies light thought; ignorance implies dark thought. Perceivable inspiration moving through ones perception allows self discernment, while choosing to hold onto suggested information tempts ignorance.
https://genius.com/Eurythmics-sweet-dreams-are-made-of-this-lyrics